On 05/03/2015 14:37, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 05/03/2015 14:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Any chance to get reviews for this series? Also we should at least
expedite this first patch into 4.0-rc as it fixes scanning races
in virtio_scsi.
I reviewed 1 and 3, but I'm not really qualified
On 02/02/2015 08:01 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Lock the device embedded in the scsi_device to protect against
concurrent calls to -remove.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
Acked-by: Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.de
Cheers,
Hannes
Any chance to get reviews for this series? Also we should at least
expedite this first patch into 4.0-rc as it fixes scanning races
in virtio_scsi.
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 02:01:24PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Lock the device embedded in the scsi_device to protect against
concurrent calls
On 02/02/2015 14:01, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Lock the device embedded in the scsi_device to protect against
concurrent calls to -remove.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
Acked-by: Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 7 +++
1 file
On 05/03/2015 14:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Any chance to get reviews for this series? Also we should at least
expedite this first patch into 4.0-rc as it fixes scanning races
in virtio_scsi.
I reviewed 1 and 3, but I'm not really qualified for patch 2.
Paolo
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:46:17AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Great, we might want to revert that patch in 3.21.
Is that fix in any tree yet? Seems like I missed it for the scsi
tree at least. So unless you want it for 3.19/stable we might as well
ust skip that patch.
--
To unsubscribe from
On 02/02/2015 13:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:46:17AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Great, we might want to revert that patch in 3.21.
Is that fix in any tree yet? Seems like I missed it for the scsi
tree at least. So unless you want it for 3.19/stable we might as
Lock the device embedded in the scsi_device to protect against
concurrent calls to -remove.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
Acked-by: Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 30/01/2015 02:08, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Fri, 01/30 00:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 29/01/2015 00:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Lock the device embedded in the scsi_device to protect against
concurrent calls to -remove.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
I wonder if this makes
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Lock the device embedded in the scsi_device to protect against
concurrent calls to -remove.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 29/01/2015 00:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Lock the device embedded in the scsi_device to protect against
concurrent calls to -remove.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
I wonder if this makes this problem: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/5/9 go
away.
Paolo
---
On Fri, 01/30 00:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 29/01/2015 00:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Lock the device embedded in the scsi_device to protect against
concurrent calls to -remove.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
I wonder if this makes this problem:
Lock the device embedded in the scsi_device to protect against
concurrent calls to -remove.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig h...@lst.de
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
13 matches
Mail list logo
