On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:29:11AM -0700, Mike Christie wrote:
Are you going to try and push someone like qla4010 which has a similar
interface to qla2xxx (it uses the msg box interface) to use the netlink
interface? With a lot of the iscsi stuff masked away it seems a little
difficult to
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 11:29:12AM -0700, Duane Grigsby wrote:
No, that's not true; we are TOTALLY committed to getting all of our
drivers in the upstream kernel. I have been working on the ISCSI driver
cleanup to the level of our Fibre Channel driver as Andrew has done. I'm
making it conform
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph Hellwig
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 1:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-iscsi development team; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 5.x branch mainline kernel push in two weeks?
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:29:11AM -0700, Mike Christie wrote
So what API are you using for communicating with userspace right now?
How much userspace support do you need? Is the current iscsi transport
class okay with you and what about the netlink version?
the current driver uses ioctls, but I will be looking at what we need
to do to replace that with
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph
Hellwig
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 1:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-iscsi development team; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 5.x branch mainline kernel push in two weeks?
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:29:11AM
5 matches
Mail list logo
