On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 22:44 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
James, please withdraw the patch above.
Actually, I already have this in the tree. Could you just do an
incremental to remove the blacklist line since I think the IBM people
still want their shark fix?
Thanks,
James
-
To unsubscribe from
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:47:09PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:44:21PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
Matt, it looks like the best way to solve this problem is to go back to
the old strategy of always setting the SCSI revision to 2 (no matter what
it might actually
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Matthew Dharm wrote:
Matt, it looks like the best way to solve this problem is to go back to
the old strategy of always setting the SCSI revision to 2 (no matter what
it might actually be), at least for Direct Access devices. That would
suppress the REPORT_LUNS
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:31:04 -0500 (EST) Alan Stern wrote:
James:
This patch adds a NOREPORTLUN blacklist flag for a disk made by WDC
(Winchester?). The drive's firmware crashes when it receives
REPORT_LUNS, even though it claims to be SCSI rev 04.
Alan Stern
Signed-off-by:
James:
This patch adds a NOREPORTLUN blacklist flag for a disk made by WDC
(Winchester?). The drive's firmware crashes when it receives REPORT_LUNS,
even though it claims to be SCSI rev 04.
Alan Stern
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
= drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c 1.14 vs
5 matches
Mail list logo