On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:58:34PM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 15:20 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 10/08/2012 06:21 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 17:27 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:43:27PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30
On 10/08/2012 06:21 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 17:27 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:43:27PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Jeff Garzik wrote:
The simple fact of only ZPODD devices out there are ATA is not the
decision-maker for where
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 15:20 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 10/08/2012 06:21 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 17:27 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:43:27PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Jeff Garzik wrote:
The simple fact of only ZPODD devices
On Tuesday 09 of October 2012 15:20:39 Aaron Lu wrote:
On 10/08/2012 06:21 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 17:27 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:43:27PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Jeff Garzik wrote:
The simple fact of only ZPODD
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:43:27PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Jeff Garzik wrote:
The simple fact of only ZPODD devices out there are ATA is not the
decision-maker for where the code should live. It is more a question
where ZPODD belongs in the device/command set
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 17:27 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:43:27PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Jeff Garzik wrote:
The simple fact of only ZPODD devices out there are ATA is not the
decision-maker for where the code should live. It is more a
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:44:50AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, September 29, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 09/29/2012 10:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I don't think this is a good idea, quite frankly. sr seems to be a too
generic place
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
Makes sense to me, but there is a problem if I want to block events
checking for the disk, as I do not have a pointer to the gendisk in ATA
layer.
The tray will be ejected by the ODD itself when it has power, I do not
need to do that. Moreover, I don't
On 09/30/2012 10:47 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
Makes sense to me, but there is a problem if I want to block events
checking for the disk, as I do not have a pointer to the gendisk in ATA
layer.
The tray will be ejected by the ODD itself when it has power, I
On 09/29/2012 06:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, September 29, 2012, Alan Stern wrote:
Can arbitrary SCSI devices be ZP, or does this notion apply only to
ATAPI-based drives? That's the key question, and the answer determines
where the ZP support belongs.
I agree. That said for
On 09/29/2012 06:44 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, September 29, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 09/29/2012 10:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I don't think this is a good idea, quite frankly. sr seems to be a too
generic place for that.
Does this mean sr
On 09/30/2012 10:47 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
Makes sense to me, but there is a problem if I want to block events
checking for the disk, as I do not have a pointer to the gendisk in ATA
layer.
You may discover the gendisk by going the ATA - SCSI - block
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Jeff Garzik wrote:
The simple fact of only ZPODD devices out there are ATA is not the
decision-maker for where the code should live. It is more a question
where ZPODD belongs in the device/command set model currently employed.
I don't really accept this argument. It's
On 09/30/2012 03:43 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Jeff Garzik wrote:
The simple fact of only ZPODD devices out there are ATA is not the
decision-maker for where the code should live. It is more a question
where ZPODD belongs in the device/command set model currently employed.
I
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I don't think this is a good idea, quite frankly. sr seems to be a too
generic place for that.
Does this mean sr can only have code that is useful to all devices it
manages? i.e. If a piece of code enables a feature for a special kind of
ODD(like the
On 09/29/2012 10:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I don't think this is a good idea, quite frankly. sr seems to be a too
generic place for that.
Does this mean sr can only have code that is useful to all devices it
manages? i.e. If a piece of code enables a
On Saturday, September 29, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
[Adding more people and list back in]
On 09/29/2012 05:46 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, September 28, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 09/28/2012 07:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, September 27, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On
On Saturday, September 29, 2012, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I don't think this is a good idea, quite frankly. sr seems to be a too
generic place for that.
Does this mean sr can only have code that is useful to all devices it
manages? i.e. If a piece of
On Saturday, September 29, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 09/29/2012 10:29 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I don't think this is a good idea, quite frankly. sr seems to be a too
generic place for that.
Does this mean sr can only have code that is useful to all
On 09/27/2012 06:46 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 16:01:35 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:40:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I just
[Adding more people and list back in]
On 09/29/2012 05:46 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, September 28, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 09/28/2012 07:15 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, September 27, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 09/27/2012 05:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Say the
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 16:01:35 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:40:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I just checked the spec again and tested, when the ODD
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 09/25/2012 10:23 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 22:20:21 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 09/25/2012 10:23 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:40:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
And I'd add a comment about the next poll.
This appears somewhat racy, though, because in theory a media
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:40:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
And I'd add a comment about the next poll.
This
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I'm thinking of enabling this GPE in sr_suspend once we decided that it
is ready to be powered off, so the time frame between sr_suspend and
when the power is actually removed
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 22:20:21 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I'm thinking of enabling this GPE in sr_suspend once we decided that it
is ready to be powered off, so the time frame
On 09/25/2012 10:23 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 22:20:21 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I'm thinking of enabling this GPE in sr_suspend once we decided that it
is
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 09/25/2012 10:23 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 22:20:21 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I'm thinking of enabling
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On 09/25/2012 10:23 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 22:20:21 Aaron Lu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:49:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, September 21, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:48:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
Place
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:49:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, September 21, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:48:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:49:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, September 21, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Thu,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:49:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, September 21, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:48:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
Place the ODD into runtime suspend state as soon as there
On Friday, September 21, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:48:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
Place the ODD into runtime suspend state as soon as there is nobody
using it.
OK, so how is ODD related to the sr
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
Place the ODD into runtime suspend state as soon as there is nobody
using it.
OK, so how is ODD related to the sr driver?
The only exception is, if we just find that a new medium is
inserted, we wait for the next events checking to idle it.
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
Place the ODD into runtime suspend state as soon as there is nobody
using it.
OK, so how is ODD related to the sr driver?
Aaron did not make it clear in this patch description, although it may
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:48:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
Place the ODD into runtime suspend state as soon as there is nobody
using it.
OK, so how is ODD related to the sr driver?
As Alan has explained, ODD(optical disk drive) is
Place the ODD into runtime suspend state as soon as there is nobody
using it. The only exception is, if we just find that a new medium is
inserted, we wait for the next events checking to idle it.
Based on ideas of Alan Stern and Oliver Neukum.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu aaron...@intel.com
---
40 matches
Mail list logo
