>>> Perhaps reword the changelog to say that seqc_putc is more efficient than
>>> seqc_printf to output a single char.
>>> I mean _printf is not wrong but not as efficient ?
>> I came along source files for a few other software modules with similar
>> change possibilities.
>> Unfortunately, the cor
On 10/17/2016 10:19 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> A single character (line break) should be put into a sequence.
>>> Thus use the corresponding function "seq_putc".
>> Perhaps reword the changelog to say that seqc_putc is more efficient than
>> seqc_printf to output a single char.
>> I mean _pri
>> A single character (line break) should be put into a sequence.
>> Thus use the corresponding function "seq_putc".
>
> Perhaps reword the changelog to say that seqc_putc is more efficient than
> seqc_printf to output a single char.
> I mean _printf is not wrong but not as efficient ?
I came alo
