[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] sunxi-tools: support progress display for FEL utility

On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 21:58:38 +0100 Bernhard Nortmann wrote: > This series of patches picks up on the discussion at > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/linux-sunxi/lz0oQBwjex0 > It's based on first patches submitted there, but has been extensively > reworked to

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] thermal: Add support for Sunxi THS on the Allwinner H3

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:51:48PM +0100, Josef Gajdusek wrote: > This patch adds support for the Sunxi thermal sensor on the Allwinner H3. > Also adds declaration of the H3 THS clock to clk-sunxi.c ignoring the > dividers as they are not continuous (clk-divider.c cannot be used as it > does not

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 02/27] mtd: nand: add an mtd_to_nand() helper

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:37:35PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Some drivers are retrieving the nand_chip pointer using the container_of > macro on a struct wrapping both the nand_chip and the mtd_info struct while > the standard way of retrieving this pointer is through mtd->priv. > Provide an

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 01/27] mtd: nand: fix drivers abusing mtd->priv

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:37:34PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > The ->priv field of the mtd_info object attached to a nand_chip device > should point to the nand_chip device. The pxa and cafe drivers are > assigning this field their own private structure, which works fine as long > as the

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] ARM: sunxi: Re-enable SID driver in sunxi_defconfig

Hi, On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:48:35PM +0100, Timo Sigurdsson wrote: > Hi Maxime, > Hi Chen-Yu, > > Am Dienstag, den 17.11.2015, 02:42 +0100 schrieb Timo Sigurdsson: > > Commit 3d0b16a66c8a ("nvmem: sunxi: Move the SID driver to the nvmem > > framework") moved the the sunxi SID driver to a new

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: sunxi: Re-enable SID driver in multi_v7_defconfig

On 20.11.2015 06:33, Timo Sigurdsson wrote: > Commit 3d0b16a66c8a ("nvmem: sunxi: Move the SID driver to the nvmem > framework") moved the the sunxi SID driver to a new framework, but left > multi_v7_defconfig with the deprecated config symbol EEPROM_SUNXI_SID > instead of the new symbol

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: sunxi: Clean up sunxi_defconfig

Clean up sunxi_defconfig by generating a fresh file via make sunxi_defconfig make savedefconfig While this moves around a few lines and removes unnecessary symbols, it doesn't introduce any functional changes. The resulting .config is identical before and after this patch. Signed-off-by:

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: sunxi: Really enable LRADC keys in sunxi_defconfig

Commit be8becb81bdc ("ARM: sunxi_defconfig: Enable LRADC keys (KEYBOARD_SUN4I_LRADC)") added CONFIG_KEYBOARD_SUN4I_LRADC=y to sunxi_defconfig. However, it depends on CONFIG_KEYBOARD which is explicitly disabled in sunxi_defconfig. Hence, the LRADC keys were never actually enabled. Remove the line

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: sunxi: Re-enable SID driver in sunxi_defconfig

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Timo Sigurdsson wrote: > Commit 3d0b16a66c8a ("nvmem: sunxi: Move the SID driver to the nvmem > framework") moved the the sunxi SID driver to a new framework, but left > sunxi_defconfig with the deprecated config symbol

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] ARM: sunxi: Re-enable SID driver in sunxi_defconfig

Sorry, sent out the reply first to Maxime only and forgot to include the rest of the bunch. So, here we go again... Hi Maxime, Am Freitag, den 20.11.2015, 00:43 +0100 schrieb Maxime Ripard: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:48:35PM +0100, Timo Sigurdsson wrote: > > Hi Maxime, > > Hi

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: sunxi: Re-enable SID driver in sunxi_defconfig

Commit 3d0b16a66c8a ("nvmem: sunxi: Move the SID driver to the nvmem framework") moved the the sunxi SID driver to a new framework, but left sunxi_defconfig with the deprecated config symbol EEPROM_SUNXI_SID instead of the new symbol NVMEM_SUNXI_SID. Hence, re-enable the driver in sunxi_defconfig.

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: sunxi: Re-enable SID driver in sunxi_defconfig

Sorry, I probably shouldn't send patches at an hour I should rather be sleeping... As a result, I forgot to add the patch history. Here it is: Changes in v2: - Move the extra cleanup work for sunxi_defconfig to a separate patch - Add another patch to meet the dependencies of

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: sunxi: Really enable LRADC keys in sunxi_defconfig

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Timo Sigurdsson wrote: > Commit be8becb81bdc ("ARM: sunxi_defconfig: Enable LRADC keys > (KEYBOARD_SUN4I_LRADC)") added CONFIG_KEYBOARD_SUN4I_LRADC=y to > sunxi_defconfig. However, it depends on CONFIG_KEYBOARD which is > explicitly

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2] ARM: sunxi: Re-enable SID driver in multi_v7_defconfig

Commit 3d0b16a66c8a ("nvmem: sunxi: Move the SID driver to the nvmem framework") moved the the sunxi SID driver to a new framework, but left multi_v7_defconfig with the deprecated config symbol EEPROM_SUNXI_SID instead of the new symbol NVMEM_SUNXI_SID. Hence, re-enable the driver in

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] ARM: sunxi: Re-enable SID driver in sunxi_defconfig

Hi Maxime, Hi Chen-Yu, Am Dienstag, den 17.11.2015, 02:42 +0100 schrieb Timo Sigurdsson: > Commit 3d0b16a66c8a ("nvmem: sunxi: Move the SID driver to the nvmem > framework") moved the the sunxi SID driver to a new framework, but left > sunxi_defconfig with the deprecated config symbol

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for inter-word wait cycles using the SPI Wait Clock Register

Hi Marcus, On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:53 AM, Marcus Weseloh wrote: > Adds support and documentation for a new slave device property > "sun4i,spi-wdelay" that allows to set the SPI Wait Clock Register per > device / transfer. The SPI hardware will wait the specified amount of

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: dts: sun4i: gemei-g9: Enable sun4i audio codec support

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:53:19PM +0200, Priit Laes wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 11:59 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Priit Laes wrote: >> > >

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/2] sunxi-tools: stuff to possibly go into 0.3

On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:11:33 +0100 Bernhard Nortmann wrote: > Am 19.11.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Peter Korsgaard: > > Both look good to me, thanks. > > > > Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard > > > > Thanks! Applied to linux-sunxi/sunxi-tools > > And in turn

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 04/19] clk: sunxi: Add TCON channel1 clock

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:36:15AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> > + sclk1_parents[0] = sclk2_name; > >> > + sclk1_parents[1] = sclk2d2_name; > >> > >> Is there any need to expose these 2 clocks via DT using > >> of_clk_add_provider? > > > > No, as far as I'm aware, there's no user

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 05/19] clk: sunxi: add DRAM gates

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 04:08:53PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Maxime Ripard > > wrote: > >> The Allwinner SoCs have a gate controller to gate the access

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for inter-word wait cycles using the SPI Wait Clock Register

Adds support and documentation for a new slave device property "sun4i,spi-wdelay" that allows to set the SPI Wait Clock Register per device / transfer. The SPI hardware will wait the specified amount of SPI clock periods (plus a constant 3 clock periods) before transmitting the next word. The

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: dts: sun4i: gemei-g9: Enable sun4i audio codec support

Hi, On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:53:19PM +0200, Priit Laes wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 11:59 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Priit Laes wrote: > > > Gemei G9 has internal speakers and headphone jack. Audio switching > > > from internal speakers to

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 01/19] clk: sunxi: Add display clock

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:31:54PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 11/06, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > Thanks for your feedback! > > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:29:02PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > + > > > > + mux = kzalloc(sizeof(*mux), GFP_KERNEL); > > > > +

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/2] sunxi-tools: stuff to possibly go into 0.3

> "Bernhard" == Bernhard Nortmann writes: > Siarhei: Here are the proposed changes that I would like to go into > sunxi-tools, possibly before you tag a 0.3 release. It's not urgent > (could be postponed to a later point in time), but I think it would > be nice

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH] spi: dts: sun4i: Add support for inter-word wait cycles

Hi all, the Allwinner A10/A20 SPI module supports an option to configure a number of clock periods to wait between each word ("SPI Wait Clock Register" in the A20 manual). This is a very useful option if talking to devices which specify a minimum amount of inter-word wait time. I initially tried

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/2] sunxi-tools: stuff to possibly go into 0.3

Siarhei: Here are the proposed changes that I would like to go into sunxi-tools, possibly before you tag a 0.3 release. It's not urgent (could be postponed to a later point in time), but I think it would be nice to include these into a "release point". Regards, B. Nortmann Bernhard Nortmann (2):

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/2] sunxi-tools: make use of proper boolean data types

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann --- fel.c | 15 --- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fel.c b/fel.c index 4561d02..348f01c 100644 --- a/fel.c +++ b/fel.c @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] sunxi-tools: some trivial fixes

- get rid of double includes - fix U-Boot source reference - get rid of "uboot_autostart" variable Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann --- fel.c | 12 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fel.c b/fel.c index e9f6450..4561d02 100644

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/2] sunxi-tools: stuff to possibly go into 0.3

Am 19.11.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Peter Korsgaard: Both look good to me, thanks. Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard Thanks! Applied to linux-sunxi/sunxi-tools And in turn that also means: No objections from me against tagging a 0.3 release. Regards, B. Nortmann -- You received

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] sunxi-tools: support progress display for FEL utility

Hi Siarhei! Am 19.11.2015 um 09:04 schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: [...] My biggest concern is the command line interface. It is basically stateless vs. stateful approach. You are in favour of allowing switches, which modify the state anywhere in the command line and then have regular commands