Hi Stefan,
you didn't include me in your answer, hence the late reply...
Stefan Monnier schrieb am 29.07.2015 02:02:
IMHO for a common maximum opp that's a good approach. But for the lowest
frequency setting, it would seem more logical to me, to raise the voltage
to a point where all boards
Hi,
Hans de Goede schrieb am 27.07.2015 14:43:
I've a simular patch here:
https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commit/6a30b7d5be6012b81e5e1439a444e41c0ac1afc1
I did not submit this upstream yet as it is part of a series to enable the
otg
controller on the bananapi which needs
Hi,
Chen-Yu Tsai schrieb am 27.07.2015 15:14:
ChenYu (in the CC), since you did most of the original work here, do
you know why we have an op at 0.9 volt, but none of our boards allow the
voltage to go that low in the regulator settings ?
I'm on vacation now, so apologies for the bad
Hi,
On 07/28/2015 02:49 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:43:20PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 27-07-15 14:09, public_tim...@silentcreek.de wrote:
Hi,
Hans de Goede schrieb am 27.07.2015 10:07:
I've a simular patch here:
Hi,
Maxime Ripard schrieb am 28.07.2015 14:49:
I don't feel like holding patches that were posted before you did
because you did them some time ago and never submitted them is
reasonnable and / or encouraging for new submitters of patches.
I'd really like to get more sunxi-people
Hi,
Maxime Ripard schrieb am 28.07.2015 14:55:
IMHO for a common maximum opp that's a good approach. But for the lowest
frequency setting, it would seem more logical to me, to raise the voltage
to a point where all boards will run fine with them, unless those boards
cannot handle the
Hi,
On 07/28/2015 05:09 PM, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
Hi,
Hans de Goede schrieb am 28.07.2015 16:24:
I've no problem with Timo submitting a cleaned up version of his
patch and you taking that instead. I just wanted to point out that
I do have a similar patch pending.
Ok, I will do that. It
Hi,
Hans de Goede schrieb am 27.07.2015 10:07:
I've a simular patch here:
https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commit/6a30b7d5be6012b81e5e1439a444e41c0ac1afc1
I did not submit this upstream yet as it is part of a series to enable the otg
controller on the bananapi which needs
Hi,
On 27-07-15 14:09, public_tim...@silentcreek.de wrote:
Hi,
Hans de Goede schrieb am 27.07.2015 10:07:
I've a simular patch here:
https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commit/6a30b7d5be6012b81e5e1439a444e41c0ac1afc1
I did not submit this upstream yet as it is part of a series to
2015年7月27日 下午8:54於 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com寫道：
Hi,
On 27-07-15 14:36, public_tim...@silentcreek.de wrote:
Hi again,
one more thing...
Hans de Goede schrieb am 27.07.2015 10:07:
IMHO we should just stick with the standard operating points unless we
know
that there are
Hi,
On 27-07-15 14:36, public_tim...@silentcreek.de wrote:
Hi again,
one more thing...
Hans de Goede schrieb am 27.07.2015 10:07:
IMHO we should just stick with the standard operating points unless we know
that there are stability issues with them (such as e.g. on the A10 OlinuxIno
Lime).
Hi again,
one more thing...
Hans de Goede schrieb am 27.07.2015 10:07:
IMHO we should just stick with the standard operating points unless we know
that there are stability issues with them (such as e.g. on the A10 OlinuxIno
Lime).
If we stick to the standard operating points, shouldn't we
Hi,
On 27-07-15 03:28, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
sun7i-a20-bananapi.dts doesn't contain regulator nodes for the AXP209 PMU
driver, so add them to allow for voltage-scaling with cpufreq-dt. With the
regulators enabled, we can define board-specific operating points. The defined
CPU voltages are more
sun7i-a20-bananapi.dts doesn't contain regulator nodes for the AXP209 PMU
driver, so add them to allow for voltage-scaling with cpufreq-dt. With the
regulators enabled, we can define board-specific operating points. The defined
CPU voltages are more conservative (based on the values used by the
14 matches
Mail list logo
