Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Stable Kernel 4.20.1 (NanoPi A64 / BananaPi M64)

2019-01-13 Thread @lex
Another interesting thing is that a read here the RTC issue and some workaround for that. I do not anything wrong with RTC (yet) with this DTS, maybe i misunderstood what the problem is or was just lucky!? On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at 7:51:06 PM UTC-2, @lex wrote: > > Ok, the sound seems to be

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Stable Kernel 4.20.1 (NanoPi A64 / BananaPi M64)

2019-01-13 Thread @lex
Ok, the sound seems to be fixed. The thermal thing is still a mystery to me. I would need to see if someone has it working. On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at 5:10:16 PM UTC-2, @lex wrote: > > Sounds good. I think i'd better restart with linux-next as a reference. > > On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Stable Kernel 4.20.1 (NanoPi A64 / BananaPi M64)

2019-01-13 Thread @lex
Sounds good. I think i'd better restart with linux-next as a reference. On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at 4:51:20 PM UTC-2, CodeKipper wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 18:42, @lex > > wrote: > > > > Hmm, i thought you would know about the wrong size, or where to look > for. > > The patches are

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Stable Kernel 4.20.1 (NanoPi A64 / BananaPi M64)

2019-01-13 Thread Code Kipper
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 18:42, @lex wrote: > > Hmm, i thought you would know about the wrong size, or where to look for. > The patches are maybe from Icenowy, Jagan and some others, maybe they can > give some directions. > I have seen a showcase of Pine64SO with sound working but have yet to see a

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Stable Kernel 4.20.1 (NanoPi A64 / BananaPi M64)

2019-01-13 Thread @lex
Hmm, i thought you would know about the wrong size, or where to look for. The patches are maybe from Icenowy, Jagan and some others, maybe they can give some directions. I have seen a showcase of Pine64SO with sound working but have yet to see a public DTS for kernel 4.20 as i have provided here,

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Stable Kernel 4.20.1 (NanoPi A64 / BananaPi M64)

2019-01-13 Thread Code Kipper
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 13:35, @lex wrote: > > Hi Marcus, > Thank you for the input. > > The patch seems to be verbatim. > The message is clear about the size mismatch, but where it should be fixed? > > #thermal-sensor-cells = <2>; <= this gives the warning about the wronng size > > The bootlog bel

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Stable Kernel 4.20.1 (NanoPi A64 / BananaPi M64)

2019-01-13 Thread @lex
Hi Marcus, Thank you for the input. The patch seems to be verbatim. The message is clear about the size mismatch, but where it should be fixed? *#thermal-sensor-cells = <2>; <= this gives the warning about the wronng size* The bootlog below is when *#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;* and *no* ths

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Stable Kernel 4.20.1 (NanoPi A64 / BananaPi M64)

2019-01-13 Thread Code Kipper
s s On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 at 20:33, @lex wrote: > > I've tried to apply this patch in a hope to get the thermal sensor working > but things got hairy, can anyone please explain what is wrong with this patch: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10555615/ Hi Alex, check the patch after applying git

[linux-sunxi] Re: Stable Kernel 4.20.1 (NanoPi A64 / BananaPi M64)

2019-01-12 Thread @lex
I've tried to apply this patch in a hope to get the thermal sensor working but things got hairy, can anyone please explain what is wrong with this patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10555615/ Warnings: DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-bananapi-m64.dtb arch/arm64/boot/dts