On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 02:34:54AM +0200, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Henrik Nordström
hen...@henriknordstrom.net wrote:
fre 2015-03-06 klockan 18:28 +0800 skrev Quink:
cedarx2.0 is a refactoring of cedarx1.0. The job is finished about
just
three month ago
On 03/16/15 14:52, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
Even if people ignore the terms of the LGPL, like you clearly do, there
are still LGPLed symbols present in that binary.
I suggest that you start by reading up on the GPL and LGPL licenses.
Luc Verhaegen.
i think he already has:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:16:47PM +, Simon Kenyon wrote:
On 03/16/15 14:52, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
Even if people ignore the terms of the LGPL, like you clearly do, there
are still LGPLed symbols present in that binary.
I suggest that you start by reading up on the GPL and LGPL licenses.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Henrik Nordström
hen...@henriknordstrom.net wrote:
fre 2015-03-06 klockan 18:28 +0800 skrev Quink:
cedarx2.0 is a refactoring of cedarx1.0. The job is finished about
just
three month ago and not used by most vendors yet. Some work is still
needed
to port
fre 2015-03-06 klockan 18:28 +0800 skrev Quink:
cedarx2.0 is a refactoring of cedarx1.0. The job is finished about
just
three month ago and not used by most vendors yet. Some work is still
needed
to port cedarx2.0 to linux. The directory of cedarx2.0 in Android SDK
is
On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 23:32:51 +0100
Henrik Nordström hen...@henriknordstrom.net wrote:
fre 2015-03-06 klockan 18:28 +0800 skrev Quink:
cedarx2.0 is a refactoring of cedarx1.0. The job is finished about
just
three month ago and not used by most vendors yet. Some work is still
needed
to
