also affects me
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of UBUNTU -
AL - BR, which is subscribed to Chromium Browser.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972762
Title:
Firefox and Chromium snaps preventing apps and devices from working
correctly.
Status in Chromium
Redundant comment: see above.
Perhaps distributing this as a snap isn't as great an idea as it must
have once seemed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of UBUNTU -
AL - BR, which is subscribed to Chromium Browser.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972762
Title:
Redundant comment: see above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of UBUNTU -
AL - BR, which is subscribed to Chromium Browser.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972762
Title:
Firefox and Chromium snaps preventing apps and devices from working
correctly.
Status in
I would just like to add another angry, frustrated, and probably
redundant comment: I've been using Ubuntu since 2005, after switching
from Debian because Ubuntu worked better out of the box for basic things
like WiFi or watching videos. Over the years I've been very happy with
Ubuntu, but now
I can't open local html documentation in my home folder. While I
understand the safety benefits of not giving your internet browser
access to your personal files and I think it's a good thing ubuntu
thinks about these issues firefox is also the main help browser on my
system. There should be a way
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: r-cran-plotly (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of UBUNTU -
AL - BR, which is subscribed to Chromium Browser.
This also breaks r-cran-plotly because it places the plots as html files
in /tmp and tries to open them with firefox.
** Also affects: r-cran-plotly (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of UBUNTU -
AL - BR, which is
This is a severe regression that absolutely needs to be fixed ASAP.
There are several tools and applications for various purposes produce
HTML documentation or reports, that cannot be opened in Firefox.
For example:
- Intel Advisor:
I can't open certain e-mail-attachments which are important to me and my
work, because Thunderbird places them in /tmp/pid-9/ and opens them
with my default browser.
I first thought, this should be easily fixable -- but no, there seems
not to be a workaround (other than manually installing
I have exactly the same problem that Mario (mario-gleirscher) reported
on 2022-11-17. My Java IDE is Apache Netbeans, and if, for example, I
want to look at the documentation for the Pattern class, it tries, and
fails, to load the file "file:///usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-
I am also affected when using `kde-open5 fish://hostname/myfile.html`
that transparantly opens over ssh and saves temp file under .config.
Switching to deb package because of this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of UBUNTU -
AL - BR, which is subscribed to Chromium
This is still broken on the Firefox 108 snap.
(I have a similar use case: I'd like to local local copies of
documentation from `rustup doc` and other sources.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of UBUNTU -
AL - BR, which is subscribed to Chromium Browser.
This also breaks `rustup doc` for the same reason.
Running `snap connections firefox` I can see `personal-files` is already
enabled.
It's trying to load:
/home/malachi/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/share/doc/rust/html/index.html
but gets access denied.
My Chrome is not
I can only second much what has been said.
My Java IDE wants to open local Java API doc with my browser (Firefox in
that case), and instead of opening the local doc, it shows me an error
message because "file://" is pointing to a Snap sandbox or something
alike and not to the root filesystem.
This bug breaks any application that uses firefox to open local files in
/tmp for display. I'd politely suggest that breaking this sort of widely
supported and used functionality for no clear benefit or advantage is
perhaps not the best design choice. This is especially true when users
can simply
15 matches
Mail list logo
