Hi,
On 17 October 2016 at 19:53, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Baolin Wang writes:
>>> Baolin Wang writes:
When we change the USB function with configfs dynamically, we possibly met
this
situation: one core is
Hi,
Baolin Wang writes:
>> Baolin Wang writes:
>>> When we change the USB function with configfs dynamically, we possibly met
>>> this
>>> situation: one core is doing the control transfer, another core is trying to
>>> unregister the USB gadget
Hi,
On 17 October 2016 at 18:10, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Baolin Wang writes:
>> When we change the USB function with configfs dynamically, we possibly met
>> this
>> situation: one core is doing the control transfer, another core is trying to
Hi,
Baolin Wang writes:
> When we change the USB function with configfs dynamically, we possibly met
> this
> situation: one core is doing the control transfer, another core is trying to
> unregister the USB gadget from userspace, we must wait for completing this
>
When we change the USB function with configfs dynamically, we possibly met this
situation: one core is doing the control transfer, another core is trying to
unregister the USB gadget from userspace, we must wait for completing this
control tranfer, or it will hang the controller to set the