On Saturday 28 September 2013 06:07 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:53:24AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Added a generic PHY framework that provides a set of APIs for the PHY drivers
to create/destroy a PHY and APIs for the PHY users to obtain a reference to
the PHY with
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu
wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Ming Lei wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Markus Rechberger
mrechber...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds memory
Many btusb devices have 2 modes, a hid mode and a bluetooth hci mode. These
devices default to hid mode for BIOS use. This means that after having been
reset they will revert to HID mode, and are no longer usable as a HCI.
Therefor it is a very bad idea to just blindly make reset_resume point to
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Ming Lei wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu
wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Ming Lei wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Markus Rechberger
mrechber...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds memory mapping support to USBFS for
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Actually I observed both throughput and cpu utilization can be improved
with the 4GB of DMA limit on either 32bit arch or 64bit arch, wrt. direct
I/O
over usb mass storage block device.
I didn't look into the sg API in detail yet, but
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Actually I observed both throughput and cpu utilization can be improved
with the 4GB of DMA limit on either 32bit arch or 64bit arch, wrt. direct
I/O
over usb mass
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
Very few non-xHCI controllers can do DMA above the 4 GB limit.
Yes, but I am wondering non-xHCI need this kind of zero copy
optimization, since very few user space drivers complain or care
performance or cpu
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Markus Rechberger wrote:
How about the initial patch, is it okay so far?
I haven't had time to look through it yet.
There's a settopbox manufacturer who pushed it to his next firmware
release so we can do some additional performance measuring as well.
My next step would
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Markus Rechberger wrote:
How about the initial patch, is it okay so far?
I haven't had time to look through it yet.
There's a settopbox manufacturer who pushed it to his next firmware
release
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Markus Rechberger wrote:
My next step would be to eliminate the kmallocs/kfrees for the single
urbs (just by allocating the urbs with the same mechanism and passing
the returned pointer to SUBMIT_URB).
The time spent allocating and freeing URBs is probably pretty
A series of commit starting at
50a97e059b USB: OHCI: make ohci-exynos a separate driver
and ending at
b8ad5c3706 USB: OHCI: make ohci-pxa27x a separate driver
introduced the concept of separate OHCI drivers for particular
controllers. Respective drivers need to call ohci_init_driver() to
Hi,
my Huawei 3G modem has an embedded Smart Card reader which causes trouble when
the modem is being detected (a bunch of warn (ttyUSBx): open blocked by
driver for more than 7 seconds! in messages.log). This trivial patch corrects
the problem for me. The modem identifies itself as 12d1:1406
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:21:23AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
Understood, just making sure this was still potentially useful considering
what I found out since my last message.
Which version of powertop are you actually using? None of current
The latest, i.e. 2.4.
versions would show
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Markus Rechberger wrote:
My next step would be to eliminate the kmallocs/kfrees for the single
urbs (just by allocating the urbs with the same mechanism and passing
the returned pointer to
Am 28.09.2013 20:08, schrieb Marc MERLIN:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:21:23AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
Understood, just making sure this was still potentially useful considering
what I found out since my last message.
Which version of powertop are you actually using? None of current
The
From: Ming Lei ming@canonical.com
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:59:35 +0800
Commit 638c5115a7949(USBNET: support DMA SG) introduces DMA SG
if the usb host controller is capable of building packet from
discontinuous buffers, but missed handling padding packet when
building DMA SG.
This
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Markus Rechberger
mrechber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Markus Rechberger
mrechber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu
wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Markus Rechberger wrote:
My
Dear Alan,
I don't know. Did you run all these tests on the same computer?
Yes, it is a single board computer, see image here:
http://rhombus-tech.net/allwinner_a10/hacking_the_mele_a1000/A10_device_a1000_inside.jpg
WLAN Adapter is left at the bottom.
What happens if you back-port your
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013, Arokux X wrote:
What happens if you back-port your glue driver to the vendor's kernel?
I have now 200 lines of code which are (almost) identical. They work
in vendor's kernel and fail in mainline.
This indicates that the problem isn't in your glue driver, but is
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
A series of commit starting at
50a97e059b USB: OHCI: make ohci-exynos a separate driver
and ending at
b8ad5c3706 USB: OHCI: make ohci-pxa27x a separate driver
introduced the concept of separate OHCI drivers for particular
controllers.
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Markus Rechberger wrote:
I hope the SG transfer does not introduce any latency issues we have
some usb chipsets which are very picky about latency issues on
embedded systems.
The latency for SG transfers should be smaller than for non-SG.
We got it work by tuning the
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Markus Rechberger wrote:
I put together a few reports:
http://support.sundtek.com/index.php/topic,350.0.html
http://support.sundtek.com/index.php/topic,1097.msg7780.html#msg7780
http://support.sundtek.com/index.php/topic,411.msg2153.html#msg2153
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013, Markus Rechberger wrote:
to follow up I know why it doesn't happen anymore because customers
are using a kernel module which does optimized transfers and
pre-allocated the URBs and transfer buffer in kernelspace, the
interface just copies the datastream to our actual
23 matches
Mail list logo