On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Christian Böhme wrote:
Alan Stern stern@... writes:
Given that hid_mouse_ignore_list[] actually contains the proper
(USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE, USB_DEVICE_ID_APPLE_WELLSPRING2_ISO) pair
as far as I can make out and assuming a properly working compiler,
Jiri Slaby jirislaby@... writes:
It would be helpful to see who is actually bound to the two interfaces
of the device. What's the output of
readlink /sys/bus/usb/devices/≤device:1.*/driver
for the corresponding device? The mouse should be handled by bcm5974,
the other by usbhid (and by
Alan Stern stern@... writes:
I came back to this old email today, and it turns out that
usbhid_probe() already includes the following lines:
if (intf-cur_altsetting-desc.bInterfaceProtocol ==
USB_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_MOUSE)
hid-type =
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015, Christian Böhme wrote:
Alan Stern stern@... writes:
I came back to this old email today, and it turns out that
usbhid_probe() already includes the following lines:
if (intf-cur_altsetting-desc.bInterfaceProtocol ==
Alan Stern stern@... writes:
I agree. The problem is that the HID core now tests for hdev-type ==
HID_TYPE_USBMOUSE, but it doesn't test for bInterfaceProtocol ==
USB_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_MOUSE like the older code did.
This issue should be reported to the author of that second commit
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Christian Böhme wrote:
Alan Stern stern@... writes:
Specifically, HID_QUIRK_IGNORE_MOUSE existed in 2.6.27
and was dealt with in drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:730,
thereby somehow fixing things. But those lines (and
the symbol) disappeared after 2.6.27. Why
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Christian Böhme wrote:
Hello all,
this is a response to
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14987#c6
whose main thread more or less merely rehashes what was
already said in other (bug) reports before it elsewhere.
I'd like for this to be a reminder that
Alan Stern stern@... writes:
Specifically, HID_QUIRK_IGNORE_MOUSE existed in 2.6.27
and was dealt with in drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:730,
thereby somehow fixing things. But those lines (and
the symbol) disappeared after 2.6.27. Why were they
removed?
They weren't removed. The
Hello all,
this is a response to
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14987#c6
whose main thread more or less merely rehashes what was
already said in other (bug) reports before it elsewhere.
I'd like for this to be a reminder that the issue never
really was resolved but left lingering
