Re: [linux-usb-devel] SDDR09 driver update

2001-04-05 Thread Eric Sandeen
Robert Baruch wrote: > > All, > > The latest release of the SDDR09 driver (in the CVS tree) contains fixes > for reading 32MB and larger SmartMedia cards. I was able to successfully > read a fully-loaded 32MB card. Also I added support for 128MB cards. Hm, I hit the "too big size" BUG() in kmal

[linux-usb-devel] SDDR09 driver update

2001-04-05 Thread Robert Baruch
All, The latest release of the SDDR09 driver (in the CVS tree) contains fixes for reading 32MB and larger SmartMedia cards. I was able to successfully read a fully-loaded 32MB card. Also I added support for 128MB cards. --Rob ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [linux-usb-devel] SanDisk SDDR09

2001-04-05 Thread Robert Baruch
Hi William, If you want to use SmartMedia cards which are 32MB or larger, you probably want to use this latest driver! --Rob /* Driver for SanDisk SDDR-09 SmartMedia reader * * $Id: sddr09.c,v 1.16 2001/03/27 22:37:55 groovyjava Exp $ * * SDDR09 driver v0.1: * * First release * * Curr

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Press Release #1

2001-04-05 Thread Brad Hards
Brad Hards wrote: > > "Stephen J. Gowdy" wrote: > > > > Hi Brad, > > Should I add it to our web site then? Where did you sent it? > > G'day Stephen, > > It went to a stack of places - linux related and USB related. > > Linux PR, LWN, Newsforge are covering it so far: > http://lwn.net/d

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Finepix 1400: hotplug question

2001-04-05 Thread David Brownell
> But when I disconnect the cable or turn the camera off after unmounting > /dev/sda1 which is the contents of my SmartMedia card I get the following > message on the console on standard error: > > uhci: host controller halted. very bad Not a good sign ... :) Have you tried the latest patches a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB Belkin device id change

2001-04-05 Thread Matthew Dharm
Well, if it's correct, then it's correct, and therefore doesn't need changing. I'll crawl back into my hole now Matt On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:36:16AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:12:47AM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > > The comment indicates that the value is identica

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bug: two devices get same scsi LUN

2001-04-05 Thread Pete Zaitcev
LUNs are _supposed_ to be the same, because we register new host for every storage device. However, there is a high profile bug here where LUN,ID,Channel and Host are the same, and I got a monstrous headache auditing drivers/usb/scsiglue.c, .../usb.c, drivers/scsi/host.c, etc., all in vain. I fle

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB Belkin device id change

2001-04-05 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:12:47AM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > The comment indicates that the value is identical to another value used by > another vendor... if you're changing the value, doesn't the truth of that > statement change? Technically yes, but since a device with that id does not exi

[linux-usb-devel] Finepix 1400: hotplug question

2001-04-05 Thread Neil Zanella
Hello, I have posted the following on the Linux USB users mainling list but got no response so I am posting it here... I just downloaded and installed kernel 2.4.3 and tested my Fujifim Finepix 1400 with this new kernel. I find that initially the camera works fine. But when I disconnect the cab

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB Belkin device id change

2001-04-05 Thread Matthew Dharm
The comment indicates that the value is identical to another value used by another vendor... if you're changing the value, doesn't the truth of that statement change? Matt On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 11:04:37AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:39:06AM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB Belkin device id change

2001-04-05 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:39:06AM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Not to be pedantic... but doesn't the comment on that line need to be > changed also? I don't get it, what should the comment be changed to? thanks, greg k-h -- greg@(kroah|wirex).com ___

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB Belkin device id change

2001-04-05 Thread Matthew Dharm
Not to be pedantic... but doesn't the comment on that line need to be changed also? Matt On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 06:01:24PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Hi, > > This patch against 2.4.3 fixes the GoHubs GO-COM232 product id, to match > the shipping device, not the development device :) > > thanks,

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Floods of "status!=1" in usb-uhci

2001-04-05 Thread Miles Lane
Mark McClelland wrote: > Miles Lane wrote: > > >> Mark McClelland wrote: >> >> >>> Georg Acher wrote: >>> > On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 10:06:23PM -0500, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > >> many users complain (and file bugs) about a flood of >> the following message: >> >> interr

[linux-usb-devel] Linux USB framework functions

2001-04-05 Thread Patrick Heavey
Hi I am attempting to implement a library that can be linked into applications wishing to exchange reports with HIDs (specifically UPSs) over the USB. So far, it looks like I can identify the particular device on the USB by parsing /proc/bus/usb/devices, and then open up a channel to the de

Re: [linux-usb-devel] linux version for patch

2001-04-05 Thread David Brownell
> I have to use Linux kernel version 2.4.1 for my sh architecture. OK; the patch adding the hcca support was posted pretty recently, you presumably found it in the archives. Or just use the latest OHCI driver (from 2.4.3). > But for my architecture there is a problem with pci_alloc_consistent:

[linux-usb-devel] linux version for patch

2001-04-05 Thread Orazio Privitera
Hello David, I have to use Linux kernel version 2.4.1 for my sh architecture. So I have tried to apply your patchs to it. First I have added to usb-ohci.c file hcca allocation with pci_alloc_consistent (I don't know if this is a correct procedure but ,in this way, patchs application doesn'give

[linux-usb-devel] linux version for patch

2001-04-05 Thread Orazio Privitera
Hello David, I have to use Linux kernel version 2.4.1 for my sh architecture. So I have tried to apply your patchs to it. First I have added to usb-ohci.c file hcca allocation with pci_alloc_consistent (I don't know if this is a correct procedure but ,in this way, patchs application doesn'give

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Floods of "status!=1" in usb-uhci

2001-04-05 Thread Mark McClelland
Miles Lane wrote: > Mark McClelland wrote: > > > Georg Acher wrote: > >>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 10:06:23PM -0500, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > many users complain (and file bugs) about a flood of > the following message: > > interrupt, status 3 frame# NNN > > > Here are some thing

[linux-usb-devel] New Device added to USBVISION code

2001-04-05 Thread Dwaine_Garden
I have added another device to the list of working items. Vendor id 0x573 and Product id 0x4d01 Could someone with this deivce test it. Grab it from www.emuit.com/webcam.html. I do have a few people willing to help with a clean up of the driver and fixing the framerate problems

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Additional USB Hotplug Information

2001-04-05 Thread Allen Barnett
The proc_ioctl() function in devio.c which invokes the driver specific ioctl appears to take care of copying the data structure back to user space (on or about line 1087 of devio.c). Allen Mark McClelland wrote: > > Allen Barnett wrote: > > > + case USBDEVFS_DRIVER_DEVINFO: > > +