Quoting Stefan Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How do I get the callback to cbTbl.processData to be called?
/* No signals - we just got new data in dp queue */
if (uvd->flags & FLAGS_NO_DECODING)
usbvideo_CollectRawData(uvd, frame);
else if (VALID_CALLBACK(uvd, processData))
GET_CA
Looking for candidates to resolve the other issues I've seen, I've came
along the bandwidth operations when submitting iso/int urb's. Well, this
is definitely unrelated to my problems (bulk-only) and I don't have a test
case where it breaks so far. However I believe it's worth to be reported.
Wh
Hi,
I have got a problem with my ADSL modem,
I've follow the how to,
but I get these errors:
usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout
usbdevfs: USBDEVFS_BULK failed dev 5 ep 0x5 len 991 ret -110
I also get the messaged that
speedmgmt failed to claim device
anyone know why these messages are appearing...I'
seems my tests are pretty good in hitting some critical paths ;-)
This one happened during load/consistency test using usb-ohci on
UP testbox and 2.4.4-vanilla. (ksymoops attached)
May 6 14:13:15 srv kernel: kernel BUG at usb-ohci.h:465!
The thing was triggered from fop->read/write in the foll
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> Here's a new updated version. Remove the previous patch first.
Looks good!
Tried all my tests which revealed the problem so far. Nothings breaks
anymore. Seems the HC/HCD-race on qh->element is solved!
Performance is good now, >1 MB/sec again. (Some
> > For the testing of ISOC frames, and the test bit that is
> > in webcamgo.c,- separate frames, clean frames - Is there
> > may ant V4L client that handles that correctly?
>
> These flags control how the driver converts the camera datastream
> into sequence of frames. These flags do not affect
On Sunday, 6. May 2001 20:00, you wrote:
> On Sun, 6 May 2001, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Yes and no. They lack permissions.
> > Usbdevfs more or less forces you to use all the hotplugging support
> > infrastructure.
>
> There is a usb_perm daemon which you can configure to do what you want I
> thi
> > And it's not useful to criticise usb for having an
> > API that firewire is missing ... again, that's less
> > helpful than doing it the other way around.
>
> Firewire has another API to do that.
> What I am critical of is creating several APIs to do the same thing.
I see one API to expose U
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Yes and no. They lack permissions.
> Usbdevfs more or less forces you to use all the hotplugging support
> infrastructure.
There is a usb_perm daemon which you can configure to do what you want I
think. It is available from;
http://www.xena.uklinux.net
> > Well, actually no, they are not.
> > Working through usbdevfs is limited to usb obviously.
> > There are eg. cameras with both, usb and firewire.
>
> I thought this discussion was about scanners? :)
SANE is for cameras, too.
But, if you wish, there are firewire scanners.
And the problem is n
> > > > Or, it could go the other way around. If you're scanning /dev/...
> > > > nodes, add a corresponding ioctl to find which USB device is
> > > > involved, and then use the existing USB support to find VID/PID.
> > >
> > > This is very helpful.
> > > We should do this as generic as possible.
> I'd prefer to do USB 2.0 in the -ac tree or 2.5 and leave the Linus kernel
> tree USB 1.1 for now.
Actually the hub/infrastructure changes do seem quite safe (more so
than some changes that did get into 2.4.4 :) so it'd seem reasonable
to get those into Linus tree. Not essential, of course, bu
> > Related: USB 2.0 host controllers are in stores. Fry's lists
> > them for $50 (and up :), and they work fine with usb-ohci
> > (at "full" and "low" speeds) even if the "high speed" EHCI
> > support is still in development.
>
> I live in Seattle and have no Fry's Electronics to go to.
Well,
Brad Hards wrote:
>
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have the following USB Modem, as you can see below it appears to
> > be Comm class but it isn't being claimed by the acm driver. But that
> > doesn't necessarily supprise me as the are other sub classes (I think)
> > of the com
Brad Hards wrote:
>
> David Brownell wrote:
> >
> > > > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/linux-usb/hcd/
> > > >
> > > > Yep, I think I got that problem that'd been so annoying. With
> > > > current CVS and a prototype USB 2.0 storage device, this now
> > > > hotplugs usb-storage
Quoting gmurray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > What display program(s) are you intending to use, or be
> > > compatible with?
> >
> > All V4L clients i hope. Can you recommend any good
> > program? I have never used
> > any V4L client.
>
> For the testing of ISOC frames, and the test bit that is
> i
16 matches
Mail list logo
