G'day team,
I spent some time working a press release for the USB 2.0 support in
2.4.19 (which will be the first production kernel to have High Speed
support). I plan to release it on the day that 2.4.19 is released.
I have held off for a long time waiting for Marcelo to send me a quote,
but he
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 22:17, SwamiNathan V wrote:
> Now we have a DSL line working on a DSL modem (USB port). Since
> this
> is not compatible with the Linux platform that we have, we
> have
> configured the Modem to the Windows 2000 server.
If it is not compatible, you'd need a driver. Since
David Brownell wrote:
>>> Looking at the usb_stor_transfer_partial() code, it looks to me
>>> like it expected to know it was in the middle of an abort, but
>>> didn't ... and so it gave a catch-all message and bypassed the
>>> abort processing, rather than knowing that the only reason it'd
>
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 17:16, David Brownell wrote:
> Duncan Sands wrote:
> > Summary: not a problem with the modem.
>
> I think you'd shown this was most likely a problem with the
> UHCI driver you're using ... right? Did you verify this
> happens with both UHCIs?
Hi Dave, it is the same wit
Duncan Sands wrote:
> Summary: not a problem with the modem.
I think you'd shown this was most likely a problem with the
UHCI driver you're using ... right? Did you verify this
happens with both UHCIs?
- Dav
> As you may recall, with my USB modem plugged in, plugging
> in another device (eg:
Hello,
I am using Linux RedHat 6.1 server in my office. We were
initially
using a dialup connection to send and download mails on the
Linux.
Now we have a DSL line working on a DSL modem (USB port). Since
this
is not compatible with the Linux platform that we have, we
have
config
Summary: not a problem with the modem.
As you may recall, with my USB modem plugged in, plugging
in another device (eg: webcam) caused the modem to stop
responding to URBs (they come back with -EILSEQ = -84). Well,
if I plug in my Phillips webcam, then plug in the modem, the
webcam has the same