Внимание akция!
Закажи дo 2О дekaбря Е-маil paccылку и noлyчи бонус(paccылку по асе)
(9О5)2О3-9О-72
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
icq 283673170
forge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
Hello
I test usb massage driver based on intel pxa271 , now there is some
question.
after received SC_INQUIRY and then send a reply(seen by win pc) and
before send_status send 13 bytes , it received a reset from host, show
from following message.
from windows host, bushond, see
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 1:36 pm, Alan Stern wrote:
> Matt:
>
> This is a trivial change, but it helps at least one person. It may help
> others too -- but so far Jan is the only person to report back any test
> results. Increasing the delay from 100 to 110us won't hurt much, at any
> rate.
> Nice work. I've applied all 15 of these patches, but now
> drivers/usb/host/sl811-hcd.c and drivers/usb/gadget/dummy_hcd.c have
> build errors.
Here's the sl811-hcd patch; compile-tested only,
that system doesn't have a 2.6.11 port yet. ;)
- Dave
SL811 changes getting rid of the "hcd_dev" s
Hi, all
Both usb.c and usb-skeleton.c register their drivers(more specificly,
fops) with USB_MAJOR major nuber (kernel version 2.4.20), which is
180. When a process open the device, e.g. /usb/skelx, Which open(),
usb_open() or skel_open(), is actually called? I can guess that would
be usb_open(),
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:11:16PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> Oops: kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> NIP: C000F748 LR: C00AB5E4 SP: C18DDD10 REGS: c18ddc60 TRAP: 0300Not
> tainted
> MSR: 9032 EE: 1 PR: 0 FP: 0 ME: 1 IR/DR: 11
> DAR: , DSISR: 4000
> TASK = e7fc14e0[
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 3:15 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:41:40AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > Helps EHCI work better on NForce2 with some disk drives; please merge.
>
> This is for "post 2.6.10", right?
I'd rather it went in with your next 2.6.10 batch, assuming
you
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:41:40AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
Helps EHCI work better on NForce2 with some disk drives; please merge.
This is for "post 2.6.10", right?
thanks,
greg k-h
As the (only, so far) reporting user, I will not be adversely affected
if you choose t
I'm attaching the output of 'lspci'. All usb
controllers should be the same on the notebook (as far
as I know), but obviously 3 are different. It seems
as if I'm having problems with those 3. When I use a
usb 2-port hub in one of the 3 "troubled" controllers,
both mouse and controller seem to wo
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:15:00PM -0500, Edwin Olson wrote:
> Description:
>
> Setting the event character and latency timer can greatly improve
> performance for some applications which use the ftdi_sio module (a
> serial->USB converter). The following patch adds sysfs attributes,
> exposing
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:04:53PM -0500, Edwin Olson wrote:
> When a USB serial device is disconnected, user applications performing a
> read() now receive an error code, rather than waiting indefinitely. The
> included patch is originally from Al Borchers, massaged to apply to
> 2.6.9 and 2.6.
David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 12:40 pm, you wrote:
Should I try removing the changes in ehci-hcd.c that is marked "turn off
port power on all root hub ports" then? Or maybe it the
writel(0,&ehci->regs->inter_enable) call after the ehci_reset() there?
Maybe just disable key ch
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 4:31 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 12:59:07PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > As promised for 2.6.11, here are patches to change how HCDs manage
> > per-device state. Basically, we've had per-device state hooks since
> > 2.2.9 or so (
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:01:43 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When a USB serial device is disconnected, user applications performing a
> > read() now receive an error code, rather than waiting indefinitely.
> Thanks for doing this. I've applied it to my trees, and it will show up
>
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 12:59:07PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> As promised for 2.6.11, here are patches to change how HCDs manage
> per-device state. Basically, we've had per-device state hooks since
> 2.2.9 or so (!) but that's never matched what HCDs really needed:
> per-endpoin
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 10:35:28PM -0800, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> This patch removes all entries from unusual_devs.h that appear to have
> only been there for the MODE_XLATE flag which was removed in my previous
> patch.
>
> Greg, please apply.
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
--
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 10:34:35PM -0800, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> This patch removes all MODE_XLATE flags from unusual_devs.h. Since the
> file is no longer close to in sync with the 2.4 version, Alan and I
> agreed it's reasonable to remove all of these now.
>
> Greg, please apply.
Applied, tha
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 01:54:17AM +0100, Luca Risolia wrote:
> SN9C10x driver updates.
>
> Changes: + new, - removed, * cleanup, @ bugfix, = sync with kernels
>
> * SN9C10x system clock fine-tuning when switching from native to compressed
> format and viceversa for each image sensor
> + Add sn
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 10:03:47AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> Greg:
>
> This patch fixes a bug in the usbfs code. The driver is too zealous about
> checking for disconnected devices before doing things. In particular, it
> is necessary to reap all outstanding asynchronous URBs and unbind from
>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:41:40AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Helps EHCI work better on NForce2 with some disk drives; please merge.
This is for "post 2.6.10", right?
thanks,
greg k-h
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Re
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 04:18:57PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> This patch implements support for what we call "bulk32" devices. These are
> devices that use the BBB transport mechanism with the slight modification
> that the CBW is padded to 32 bytes (instead of the standard 31 bytes).
>
> Greg
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 05:47:54PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > But any such model or document the isn't somehow
> > automatically generated by the source doe (like our current kerneldoc
> > stuff is) would quickly get out of date.
>
> Speaking of which ... how about this README update?
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 09:24:35AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Some hardware doesn't seem to like the OHCI "suspend" state...
>
> Please merge.
For 2.6.10, or after?
thanks,
greg k-h
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Rea
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 3:15 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 09:24:35AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > Some hardware doesn't seem to like the OHCI "suspend" state...
> >
> > Please merge.
>
> For 2.6.10, or after?
It's a bugfix, but low priority for most users.
Again, I'd ra
This is patch as436 from Alan Stern.
This patch increases the delay used for Genesys devices about 10%. At
least one user reports that this created a significant improvement in
operation.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
= driver
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 12:11 pm, Roberto Reiner Uhry wrote:
> I tried with Kernel 2.6.8.1 and 2.6.9 both crashes the system.
>
> Does anybody have any idea about it?
try the latest 2.6.10-rc3-bk kernel ...
- Dave
---
SF email is sponso
Hello,
I've a Genesys USB 2 IDE Adapter and searching on the web I found many
suggests to change udelay from 100 to 200 or something bigger than
100. But when I do it I can't access the hard disk at Genesys
Adapter.
I tried with Kernel 2.6.8.1 and 2.6.9 both crashes the system.
Does anybody ha
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 10:14 pm, Dale Manny wrote:
> David,
>
> I had started my response is intermingled with your reply while I
> started taking action. I would appreciate it if you scanned through
> most of this, I have posed a couple of questions in various places.
> However we have
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 5:13 am, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > And do the IRQs continue at that point? You had the
> > Serverworks box, right? Does the attached patch change
> > anything for you?
>
> The patch you posted below solve the problem. There is no
> more annoying messages, neither in
On Monday 13 December 2004 12:00 am, Dale Manny wrote:
> ... I am now running 2.6.10-bk6
> without distracting other issues. However my data corruption problem
> continues to exist.
You may well have multiple problems here.
> I am fighting an issue of silent corruption of data from certai
30 matches
Mail list logo
