Re: [linux-usb-devel] [patch 00/03] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE()

2006-02-09 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 09 February 2006 12:32 am, Martin Diehl wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Driver needs to deal with several configurations with multiple interfaces > > > each. Custom-designed protocol. Both bulk and iso endpoints with latency > > > requirements. Not hard realtime,

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: ATI RS480-based motherboard: stuck while booting with kernel >= 2.6.15 rc1

2006-02-09 Thread Carlo E. Prelz
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: ATI RS480-based motherboard: stuck while booting with kernel >= 2.6.15 rc1 Date: gio 09 feb 06 10:00:13 -0800 Quoting David Brownell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > So at this point I'm thinking that the safe course is going to be > just completely disab

Re: [linux-usb-devel] oops in pl2303 on disconnect

2006-02-09 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 11:02:02AM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > I'm horribly busy at work, so I thought I'd just throw this here in case > anyone is interested. The pl2303 fails to submit an interrupt (probably > a schedule problem in a hub), user does "rmmod pl2303"... ta daaa. > Looks like a case

Re: [linux-usb-devel] does UHCI support non-X86 platform?

2006-02-09 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:16:03PM +0800, SH-Hu GuoZhong??] wrote: > UHCI's IO-mapped registers need X86 I/O instructions to access, but > RISC (such as ARM, MIPS) has no I/O instructions. So if we want to > access UHCI registers, it must have mem-mapped registers which can be > accessed by loa

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [patch 00/03] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE()

2006-02-09 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:32:41AM +0100, Martin Diehl wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Driver needs to deal with several configurations with multiple interfaces > > > each. Custom-designed protocol. Both bulk and iso endpoints with latency > > > requirements. Not hard realtim

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Again: device not accepting address 9, error -110

2006-02-09 Thread Ulrich Windl
On 8 Feb 2006 at 22:37, Alan Stern wrote: [...] > Can you post more of the system log, showing what happens during boot-up? See attachment. Hope it helps. > I'd like to see what happens when uhci-hcd is first loaded (and ehci-hcd, > if you've got that as well). > > And first, can you turn on

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Anybody knows about the USB interface of TI DM320?

2006-02-09 Thread David Brownell
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 11:44 pm, SH-Hu GuoZhong胡国忠] wrote: > Hi, all > > usb spec says that a frame can contain several transactions, > but how can the DM320 USB controller do that? it seems that > DM320 USB HC contains only ONE transfer type in each frame ??? You'd need to

[linux-usb-devel] does UHCI support non-X86 platform?

2006-02-09 Thread SH-Hu GuoZhong胡国忠 ]
UHCI's IO-mapped registers need X86 I/O instructions to access, but RISC (such as ARM, MIPS) has no I/O instructions. So if we want to access UHCI registers, it must have mem-mapped registers which can be accessed by load/store instructions. In a word, can UHCI Host Controller be used for non-

[linux-usb-devel] Undelivered Message

2006-02-09 Thread postmaster
The email was deleted by system policy. Attached file might be containing virus. Connection From: 127.0.0.1 From: [email protected] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:13:21 +0900 Subject: Fw: --- Scan information follows --- Virus Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] File At

[linux-usb-devel] Undelivered Message

2006-02-09 Thread postmaster
The email was deleted by system policy. Attached file might be containing virus. Connection From: 127.0.0.1 From: [email protected] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:34:22 +0900 Subject: Word file --- Scan information follows --- Virus Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fi

[linux-usb-devel] Undelivered Message

2006-02-09 Thread postmaster
The email was deleted by system policy. Attached file might be containing virus. Connection From: 127.0.0.1 From: [email protected] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:55:32 +0900 Subject: Fwd: Crazy illegal Sex! --- Scan information follows --- Virus Name: [EMAIL

RE: [linux-usb-devel] Re: ATI RS480-based motherboard: stuck while booting with kernel >= 2.6.15 rc1

2006-02-09 Thread Aleksey Gorelov
>-Original Message- >From: David Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:00 AM >To: Alan Stern >Cc: Dmitry Torokhov; Aleksey Gorelov; Carlo E. Prelz; USB >development list >Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: ATI RS480-based >motherboard: stuck while bo

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: ATI RS480-based motherboard: stuck while booting with kernel >= 2.6.15 rc1

2006-02-09 Thread David Brownell
> Other people are seeing the same thing. Take a look at > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6011 So at this point I'm thinking that the safe course is going to be just completely disabling that dubious "force SMIs on" logic that only ever lived in the "early" version of the EHCI han

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Wisegroup MP-8866 Dual USB Joypad

2006-02-09 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, John Gruenenfelder wrote: > 2.6.12: > external USB harddrive works fine > > 2.6.13: > external USB harddrive works fine > > 2.6.14: > kernel does not successfully boot on new hardware. It does finish the kernel > init and does spawn init. It appears to die while probing ha

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: ATI RS480-based motherboard: stuck while booting with kernel >= 2.6.15 rc1

2006-02-09 Thread Alan Stern
> That's what I did. I disabled the if body (surrounded it by #if 0) and > re-enabled the line that caused the freeze. The result is (apart from > the flurry of printouts that I added) exactly equal to the original > 2.6.16rc2 code, apart from this if body, which is commented out: > >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] oops in pl2303 on disconnect

2006-02-09 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > I'm horribly busy at work, so I thought I'd just throw this here in case > anyone is interested. The pl2303 fails to submit an interrupt (probably > a schedule problem in a hub), user does "rmmod pl2303"... ta daaa. > Looks like a case of use-after-free.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] How to debug copy_to_user error?

2006-02-09 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, mail mail wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote a USB smart card device driver for kernel 2.6. I can run it > with no error on kernel 2.6.11, but fail on kernel 2.6.8 and 2.6.14. > Now I can locate that the problem exist in copy_to_user() system call. > My environment is Debian Sarge 2.6.8

Re: [linux-usb-devel] How to debug copy_to_user error?

2006-02-09 Thread mail mail
Hello, Pete Can ccid be suit for any USB smart card reader? I will check it from ccid's homepage. The "right" case I mean is that in kernel 2.6.11, my device driver works find and the return value of copy_to_user is 4. So I thought this is the "right" return value. Is there any difference between

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [patch 00/03] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE()

2006-02-09 Thread Martin Diehl
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Greg KH wrote: > > Driver needs to deal with several configurations with multiple interfaces > > each. Custom-designed protocol. Both bulk and iso endpoints with latency > > requirements. Not hard realtime, but response time is critical which > > became tricky when sharing l

Re: [linux-usb-devel] How to debug copy_to_user error?

2006-02-09 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:12:10 +0800, mail mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wrote a USB smart card device driver for kernel 2.6. Why don't you use ccid? > In the right case, the return value of copy_to_user should be 4 on my > PC, and 4 is also the value on kernel 2.6.11 which can run the driver