On Wednesday 19 July 2006 11:59 am, Li Yang wrote:
> On 7/19/06, Dan Malek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >
> > > This is an incorrect assumption. Its more often that people dont
> > > post their ports to the Linux kernel for acceptance. We wil
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kumar
> Gala
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 4:09 AM
> To: Li Yang-r58472
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add USB to MPC8349 PB platform support
>
>
nux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Add USB to MPC8349 PB platform
support
>
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:59:44 +0800, "Li Yang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > But why? Most embedded products facing end-user wouldn't like users
> > to modify the system by themse
On Jul 14, 2006, at 6:52 AM, Li Yang wrote:
> This adds USB platform support to MPC8349 PB. It works with the
> fsl_usb2_udc driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig | 4 ++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc834x_sys.c | 72 +
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:59:44 +0800, "Li Yang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But why? Most embedded products facing end-user wouldn't like users
> to modify the system by themselves.
Certainly vendors won't like to give consumers extra freedoms.
However, consumers like those freedoms, even if they
On 7/19/06, Dan Malek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> > This is an incorrect assumption. Its more often that people dont
> > post their ports to the Linux kernel for acceptance. We will
> > accept any port that is willing to work with the communit
On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> This is an incorrect assumption. Its more often that people dont
> post their ports to the Linux kernel for acceptance. We will
> accept any port that is willing to work with the community. for
> example
I agree. The customers of board
On Jul 19, 2006, at 1:30 AM, Li Yang-r58472 wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:53 PM
>> To: Li Yang-r58472
>> Cc: Dan Malek; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add USB
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:53 PM
> To: Li Yang-r58472
> Cc: Dan Malek; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add USB to MPC8349 PB platform support
>
> [snip]
>
> >> Well, I t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I'm talking about opening the door to a ton of options, not that we
> have them now. For example, your patch doesnt handle the USB PHYs if
If you really assume that all this has to be handled in so many
configuration options then it proba
On Jul 18, 2006, at 9:52 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> . I'm concerned about where to draw the line because of all
> the ways a user can configure the MDS board.
IMHO, you choose one configuration that works and
make that the board port. If someone wants to change
it later, it would be a good
[snip]
>> Well, I think there is a coupling that exists between whatever your
>> boot rom is and the kernel. If you are trying to optimize boot time
>> I'd say one thing you would want is to avoid multiple writing the
>> same configuration registers.
>>
>> I dont have an issue if a fixed function
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:39 AM
> To: Dan Malek
> Cc: Li Yang-r58472; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add USB to MPC8349 PB platform support
>
>
> On Jul 17, 2006, at
> -Original Message-
> From: David Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 6:58 AM
> To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Hollis Blanchard; Kumar Gala; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Li
Yang-r58472
> Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Add
On Monday 17 July 2006 1:08 pm, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>
> Seems to me that it's far better to have init code in the kernel than
> firmware.
If there's a general Linux policy on the issue, I think that'd be it.
Plus, remember that boot firmware _can't_ always be changed/bugfixed;
sometimes it ca
On Jul 17, 2006, at 5:39 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Well, I think there is a coupling that exists between whatever your
> boot rom is and the kernel.
There shouldn't be, I've always said that, but Freescale
seems to want to insist on it :-) The problem is people
creating this evaluation/demo boa
On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Dan Malek wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:16 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>> I disagree. You are coming from this from a board that does
>> everything under the sun. I'd like to avoid having this type of
>> initialization in the kernel. There is a whole additional kitc
On Jul 17, 2006, at 3:16 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I disagree. You are coming from this from a board that does
> everything under the sun. I'd like to avoid having this type of
> initialization in the kernel. There is a whole additional kitchen
> sink that could move into the kernel as well.
We
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 14:16 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Li Yang wrote:
>
> > On 7/14/06, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Nack, my expectation is this is all setup by the boot loader.
> >
> > That's a good wish. ;) However, USB is not required by bootloader.
On Jul 14, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Li Yang wrote:
> On 7/14/06, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nack, my expectation is this is all setup by the boot loader.
>
> That's a good wish. ;) However, USB is not required by bootloader. So
> it is not likely to be initialized there. And if we put i
On 7/14/06, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nack, my expectation is this is all setup by the boot loader.
That's a good wish. ;) However, USB is not required by bootloader. So
it is not likely to be initialized there. And if we put it in
bootloader, it will be hard to change the mode(MPH
Nack, my expectation is this is all setup by the boot loader.
- k
On Jul 14, 2006, at 6:52 AM, Li Yang wrote:
> This adds USB platform support to MPC8349 PB. It works with the
> fsl_usb2_udc driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig
This adds USB platform support to MPC8349 PB. It works with the fsl_usb2_udc
driver.
Signed-off-by: Li Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig | 4 ++
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc834x_sys.c | 72 +
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/m
23 matches
Mail list logo
