Alan Stern wrote:
Can you explain what's going on in this little extract from Harald's
syslog?
usb-storage: bus_reset called
hub 1-0:0: port 2 not reset yet, waiting 10ms
hub 1-0:0: port 2 not reset yet, waiting 10ms
hub 1-0:0: port 2 not reset yet, waiting 200ms
ehci_hcd :00:09.2: port 2
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Here is some more syslog with debugging output enabled. Again,
I tried to format /dev/sdc1 using mkreiserfs after removing
the old partition table and creating a maxsize partition. Since
this problem affects file I/O, it is possible that the
syslog
Hi folks,
I get random errors when reading or writing my USB 2.0 disk
with kernel 2.6.0-test1. Just a few minutes ago mkreiserfs
got stuck. Syslog says
Jul 15 20:05:28 styx kernel: SCSI error : 2 0 0 0 return code = 0x605
Jul 15 20:05:28 styx kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdc, sector
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Using the same disk on kernel 2.4.21 together with the patches
released on June 20th the disk worked very stable. I had written
about 40 GByte on this disk without a small hiccup.
Since test1 and that 2.4.22-pre1 code are essentially the same
in terms of the low level code
David Brownell wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Using the same disk on kernel 2.4.21 together with the patches
released on June 20th the disk worked very stable. I had written
about 40 GByte on this disk without a small hiccup.
Since test1 and that 2.4.22-pre1 code are essentially the same
in terms
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
I get random errors when reading or writing my USB 2.0 disk
with kernel 2.6.0-test1. Just a few minutes ago mkreiserfs
got stuck. Syslog says
Jul 15 20:05:28 styx kernel: SCSI error : 2 0 0 0 return code = 0x605
Jul 15 20:05:28
Hi David,
David Brownell wrote:
And I notice you still didn't post the details about the disk
(and enclosure) in use on USB. IT's really no big surprise
that two different hardware+driver stacks don't act the same,
even though the (eventually) should.
Sorry, I did not realize that you are
David Brownell wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Using the same disk on kernel 2.4.21 together with the patches
released on June 20th the disk worked very stable. I had written
about 40 GByte on this disk without a small hiccup.
Since test1 and that 2.4.22-pre1 code are essentially the same
in terms
