On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Omri Schwarz wrote:
> the usb-storage module no longer produces muhc of an error scroll,
> although the kernel continues not to be able to deal.
>
> I recompiled with USB_DEBUG defined, and now I get these:
>
> ehci_hcd :00:03.3: port 2 high speed
> ehci_hcd :00:03.
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Omri Schwarz wrote:
>
> > Not in this case.
> > I've tried the machine on three different Linux stations,
> > both firewire and USB, and with different cables. So it's
> > either the kernel or the device, and in the latter case,
> > it could be that the device is just progr
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Omri Schwarz wrote:
> Not in this case.
> I've tried the machine on three different Linux stations,
> both firewire and USB, and with different cables. So it's
> either the kernel or the device, and in the latter case,
> it could be that the device is just programmed to be
>
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Omri Schwarz wrote:
>
> > Hi, folks, I foolishly bought this particular external
> > USB RAID without noticing the state of Linux support for it.
> > So I would like to know whether Linux can be expected
> > to do well with it any time soon.
> >
> > Right now, neither ehci-h
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Omri Schwarz wrote:
> Hi, folks, I foolishly bought this particular external
> USB RAID without noticing the state of Linux support for it.
> So I would like to know whether Linux can be expected
> to do well with it any time soon.
>
> Right now, neither ehci-hcd nor ohci-hcd
Hi, folks, I foolishly bought this particular external
USB RAID without noticing the state of Linux support for it.
So I would like to know whether Linux can be expected
to do well with it any time soon.
Right now, neither ehci-hcd nor ohci-hcd can deal with
this drive (dmesg logs from attempts
