Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] More USB changes for 2.5.44

2002-11-01 Thread Oliver Neukum
> - it's called after usblp_write() did an illegal (racey) thing, looking > at urb->status outside the completion function. (does anyone know > why usblp_write() isn't just issuing a single write for that buffer?) It's safe because we previously check for wcomplete==1. The completion h

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] More USB changes for 2.5.44

2002-11-01 Thread David Brownell
Linus Torvalds wrote: On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, David Brownell wrote: Oct 31 22:58:47 tove kernel: drivers/usb/core/message.c: usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout Oct 31 22:58:47 tove kernel: drivers/usb/host/ohci-dbg.c: UNLINK dc8e2b1c dev:4,ep=0-I,CTRL,flags:0,len:0/1,stat:-2 Oct 31 22:58:47 tove kerne

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] More USB changes for 2.5.44

2002-11-01 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, David Brownell wrote: > > >>Oct 31 22:58:47 tove kernel: drivers/usb/core/message.c: usb_control/bulk_msg: >timeout > >>Oct 31 22:58:47 tove kernel: drivers/usb/host/ohci-dbg.c: UNLINK dc8e2b1c >dev:4,ep=0-I,CTRL,flags:0,len:0/1,stat:-2 > >>Oct 31 22:58:47 tove k

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] More USB changes for 2.5.44

2002-11-01 Thread David Brownell
Did 2.5.44 work, but 2.5.45 not work for the printer? Nope. That machine ran 2.5.42 (or maybe 41) before that, and failed similarly. I updated it to BK as of an hour ago, and since it still failed I did the report. So it's been going on for at least a few weeks. Ok, so it wasn't a recent thin

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] More USB changes for 2.5.44

2002-10-31 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 11:20:25PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Did 2.5.44 work, but 2.5.45 not work for the printer? > > Nope. That machine ran 2.5.42 (or maybe 41) before that, and failed > similarly. I updated it to BK as of an hour ago, and si

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] More USB changes for 2.5.44

2002-10-31 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Greg KH wrote: > > Did 2.5.44 work, but 2.5.45 not work for the printer? Nope. That machine ran 2.5.42 (or maybe 41) before that, and failed similarly. I updated it to BK as of an hour ago, and since it still failed I did the report. So it's been going on for at least a fe

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] More USB changes for 2.5.44

2002-10-31 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:51:47PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > (I read off 340MB today on > the same machine, so the USB subsystem generally works fine, but printing > obviously doesn't). Did 2.5.44 work, but 2.5.45 not work for the printer? (trying to narrow this down.) thanks, greg k-h

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] More USB changes for 2.5.44

2002-10-31 Thread Linus Torvalds
Greg, recent USB drivers will not print photos on my Epson printer (and maybe nothing else, I don't use it for anythign else. Photos have been problematic in the past simply because they are _huge_, so...). I get drivers/usb/core/message.c: usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout and that is ap