Greg asked:
> Is there any reason this patch can't be applied to 2.5 instead, and then
> to 2.4 after it's proven itself?
Which seems like a reasonable question, although given the
known problems with error handling in usb-storage, I'd agree
with also getting such stuff into 2.4 ASAP once it chec
Umm... let's start with the fact that 2.5.x is polluted with all sorts of
other changes, none of which apply to 2.4.x
I've asked for someone to help with concurrent 2.4.x and 2.5.x development,
but nobody seems interested. I only have two hands and one brain, so
Heck, at one point I even as
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 07:38:09PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> Attached is a patch to usb-storage against 2.4.19-pre5. Greg, please send
> to Marcello for inclusion.
>
> This patch consolidates a great deal of common code in the URB submission
> paths, and in the reset paths. This is in prepa
