the reason for this 4-5microescond, time. Or is there
any way to remove this
JUhee
-Original Message-
From: Alan Stern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:10 PM
To: Juhee MALA
Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB Host performance
On Wed, 10 May 2006, Juhee MALA wrote:
Hello Allan,
Thanks for your answers. Just one question, when we use the URB_NO_INTERRUPT
flag, does it inhibit the interrrupt for non-error completions only? or does
it inhbit all the interrupts? If it inhibits all the interrupts how can we
monitor
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 9:08 pm, Juhee MALA wrote:
Thanks for your answers. Just one question, when we use the URB_NO_INTERRUPT
flag, does it inhibit the interrrupt for non-error completions only? or does
it inhbit all the interrupts? If it inhibits all the interrupts how can we
monitor the
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:16:57AM +0530, Juhee MALA wrote:
We are using Linux USB Host stack and doing some performance analysis.
For performance analysis we are testing it with a device, which
accepts the Bulk-OUT packets with full effieciency (not much-NYTES
from device side). We are
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Juhee MALA wrote:
We are using Linux USB Host stack and doing some performance analysis.
For performance analysis we are testing it with a device, which accepts
the Bulk-OUT packets with full effieciency (not much-NYTES from device
side). We are submitting the data of URB
-Original Message-
From: Alan Stern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:10 PM
To: Juhee MALA
Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB Host performance
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Juhee MALA wrote:
We are using Linux USB Host stack and doing some
We are using Linux USB Host stack and doing some performance analysis. For
performance analysis we are testing it with a device, which accepts the
Bulk-OUT packets with full effieciency (not much-NYTES from device side). We
are submitting the data of URB size 8kbytes. The throughput in such
