Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-12 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:00:29AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > > But do please add the EHCI patch I posted yesterday, too. :) > > > > I don't see that at all. Did you CC: me? > > No, wainted confirmation from Colin that it worked first: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-11 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 11:36:27AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > Greg: > > When you work on accepting and merging patches, do you use a single tree > for all the changes or do you have separate trees for usb, pci, i2c, and > so on? If you use a single tree then there's no real choice but to export >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-10 Thread Christopher Li
I think it is not going to matter very soon because Linus's git is going to take over the syncing problem. I spend the whole afternoon playing with the git package it is very cool! I predict we will soon be pulling from the usb.git tree and solve all the version and syncing problem, the infrastruc

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-09 Thread David Brownell
> > But do please add the EHCI patch I posted yesterday, too. :) > > I don't see that at all. Did you CC: me? No, wainted confirmation from Colin that it worked first: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=111281753127281&w=2 It's attached here. - Dave Miscellaneous updates for

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-09 Thread Alan Stern
Greg: When you work on accepting and merging patches, do you use a single tree for all the changes or do you have separate trees for usb, pci, i2c, and so on? If you use a single tree then there's no real choice but to export all the patches together -- cherry-picking the subsets will inevitably

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-08 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:59:37AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 07 April 2005 1:58 am, Greg KH wrote: > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/ > > > > Does this work out for everyone? I'll get Andrew to pull in the patches > > into the -mm trees, a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-08 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 03:13:48PM -0400, Christopher Li wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:58:29AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > - provide raw quilt directory of patches (like the directory > > > above has in it.) > > > - nightly

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-08 Thread Christopher Li
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:05:28PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > Or, if Greg has incremental patch usb1-to-usb2.patch. > > You can "quilt pop" to reach "rc2-usb1", then "quilt fold < > > usb1-to-usb2.patch". > > So you have usb2 now. > > > > Do "quilt push" again to your continue "usb-hack"

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-08 Thread Christopher Li
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 07:40:57PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 07 April 2005 12:35 pm, Christopher Li wrote: > > > Let me explain how I see quilt can fit in. We have base line: > > > > linux-2.6.11.tar.gz untar to linux/ > > > > series file: > > linux-2.6.12-rc2.patch # Linus's r

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 22:05:28 -0400 (EDT) Alan Stern wrote: | On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Christopher Li wrote: | | > So now when you what to do a "bk pull", you go out and see Greg has any | > new patch on the site or not. If there is, grab it and reapply it. | > (after using your local quilt pop out all

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 07 April 2005 12:35 pm, Christopher Li wrote: > Let me explain how I see quilt can fit in. We have base line: > > linux-2.6.11.tar.gz untar to linux/ > > series file: > linux-2.6.12-rc2.patch # Linus's rc2 patch > linux-2.6.12-rc2-usb1.patch # Greg's usb1 patch for rc2 > chris-usb-h

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Christopher Li wrote: > So now when you what to do a "bk pull", you go out and see Greg has any > new patch on the site or not. If there is, grab it and reapply it. > (after using your local quilt pop out all the patches first.) > Of course, you can make a automatic. Maybe we c

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Christopher Li
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 03:22:51PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > > And will you be sure to post a message informing us every time > > > something like that happens? > > > > Why? I never did that before. > > It was never necessary before. Changes to the gre

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Christopher Li
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:58:29AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > - provide raw quilt directory of patches (like the directory > > above has in it.) > > - nightly provide a patch against the latest kernel tree for the > > dif

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > And will you be sure to post a message informing us every time > > something like that happens? > > Why? I never did that before. It was never necessary before. Changes to the gregkh-2.6 BK tree were always monotonic and I could synchronize simply by doin

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 07 April 2005 1:58 am, Greg KH wrote: > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/ > > Does this work out for everyone? I'll get Andrew to pull in the patches > into the -mm trees, and people can see if their patches are applied or > not properly, and peop

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:38:23AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > Ok, I've now done both of these. At: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/ > > you can see a full usb, i2c, and so on patches, that are generated from > > my q

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > Ok, I've now done both of these. At: > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/ > you can see a full usb, i2c, and so on patches, that are generated from > my quilt series of patches. In the patches/ subdirectory, is my raw > qui

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > - provide raw quilt directory of patches (like the directory > above has in it.) > - nightly provide a patch against the latest kernel tree for the > different projects I keep track of (usb, i2c, pci, driver >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 11:37:38PM -0700, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > Christopher Li wrote: > > I am a long time happy quilt user. > > Took me a while to find the quilt home page... there's a lot of software > out there called quilt. > > Quilt looks pretty neat to me... > > Greg, any reason you picke

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-06 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Christopher Li wrote: > I am a long time happy quilt user. Took me a while to find the quilt home page... there's a lot of software out there called quilt. Quilt looks pretty neat to me... Greg, any reason you picked quilt over the other various alternatives? Personally I like systems based arou

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-06 Thread Christopher Li
I am a long time happy quilt user. On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > I realize this isn't the best way to handle this so far, and I know it > isn't workable. I'm thinking of doing something like the following: > > - provide raw quilt directory of patches (like t

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-06 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 02:54:02PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Wednesday 06 April 2005 2:26 pm, Greg KH wrote: > > > I'm thinking of doing something like the following: > > > > - provide raw quilt directory of patches (like the directory > > above has in it.) > > - nightly pr

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-06 Thread David Brownell
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 2:26 pm, Greg KH wrote: > I'm thinking of doing something like the following: > > - provide raw quilt directory of patches (like the directory > above has in it.) > - nightly provide a patch against the latest kernel tree for the > different

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-06 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 04:58:24PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > As per the comments about BitKeeper on lkml, I will not have a usb bk > > tree anymore. I've switched over to using quilt, and will expose that > > patchset for everyone to see in some form so t

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-06 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > As per the comments about BitKeeper on lkml, I will not have a usb bk > tree anymore. I've switched over to using quilt, and will expose that > patchset for everyone to see in some form so that people can keep up to > date with my tree. An initial dump of the

[linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-06 Thread Greg KH
As per the comments about BitKeeper on lkml, I will not have a usb bk tree anymore. I've switched over to using quilt, and will expose that patchset for everyone to see in some form so that people can keep up to date with my tree. An initial dump of the tree is at: http://www.kernel.org/p