Re: [linux-usb-devel] unusual_devs.h entry 05ab

2004-06-28 Thread Alan Stern
[Corrected a messed-up email address in Matt's message] On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Matthew Dharm wrote: > The first thing to do is check the revision numbers reported by the two > devices in question. > > Joel, does your system generate the 'unneeded entry' message? > > Matt > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004

Re: [linux-usb-devel] unusual_devs.h entry 05ab

2004-06-28 Thread Matthew Dharm
The first thing to do is check the revision numbers reported by the two devices in question. Joel, does your system generate the 'unneeded entry' message? Matt On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 05:02:41PM +0200, Jo?l Bourquard wrote: > Hi Alan, > > That's a good question :-) > > There seem to be two dif

Re: [linux-usb-devel] unusual_devs.h entry 05ab

2004-06-28 Thread Joël Bourquard
Hi Alan, That's a good question :-) There seem to be two different flavors of ISD-300 (ie: 05ab,0060) devices, one of which needs this entry to work, and the other doesn't. I have a 2 1/2'' HDD enclosure which (just like your device) doesn't need the entry (so when I plug it, I get the same warn

Re: [linux-usb-devel] unusual_devs.h entry 05ab

2004-06-28 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Michele G. wrote: > usb-storage: This device (05ab,0060,1106 S 06 P 50) has unneededSubClass > and Protocol entries in unusual_devs.h Hmm... It looks like the entire entry is unnecessary. Does you device still work okay with the patch below? Jol, can you say why the entry