On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 10:47:09AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > > Is anyone working with that? It doesn't talk to ALSA,
> > > and maybe I wasn't configuring something right but
> > > I couldn't get it to work with either the OSS or emulated
> > > OSS (under ALSA). The "original OSS" seems to
> > Is anyone working with that? It doesn't talk to ALSA,
> > and maybe I wasn't configuring something right but
> > I couldn't get it to work with either the OSS or emulated
> > OSS (under ALSA). The "original OSS" seems to
> > still [have] some bogus DMA mapping calls.
>
> It works fine for m
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 10:10:53AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Is anyone working with that? It doesn't talk to ALSA,
> and maybe I wasn't configuring something right but
> I couldn't get it to work with either the OSS or emulated
> OSS (under ALSA). The "original OSS" seems to
> still some bo
Is anyone working with that? It doesn't talk to ALSA,
and maybe I wasn't configuring something right but
I couldn't get it to work with either the OSS or emulated
OSS (under ALSA). The "original OSS" seems to
still some bogus DMA mapping calls.
- Dave
