On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Torsten Koschorrek wrote:
> @all isp1xxx users, can you tell us the name of the chip you're working
> with! I have an isp1161a1. Olav has also an isp116x, Lothar has a 1362
> as far as I know. And the others?
I use 1160.
Olav
-
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Philipp Schmid wrote:
> What I mean by better results is that as mentioned I observe PTS needing to
> be resubmitted repeatedly. When handling SOF and ATL interrupts, I've
> observed 3 cases:
>
> (1) PTDs are resubmitted multiple times but get handled eventually before
> US
> For me performance is not a requirement, correct
> operation is.
..
> I also have INTL traffic going to some extend.
Same here. At least, I haven't run into any problems with any
problems since I tweaked the buffer setup.
> I am not entirely finished debugging everything yet but I have
> the f
c 2004 15:28:43 +0100
From: Torsten Koschorrek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: synertronixx GmbH
To: Konstantin Kletschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] ISP116x / 1362 driver progress
Philipp Schmid wrote:
>What I mean by better results is that as mentioned I ob
ED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 4:09 AM
To: Philipp Schmid
Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [linux-usb-devel] ISP116x / 1362 driver progress
Hi Philipp,
Thank you for the comprehensive overview.
> A couple of observations:
>
> (a) I find many PTDS have to
Hi Philipp,
Thank you for the comprehensive overview.
> A couple of observations:
>
> (a) I find many PTDS have to be resubmitted many times before they get
> handled by the device even if they are finished submitting early in the
> frame remaining cycle.
Transfers start after subsequent SOF aft
Yes, Olav seems to be working on a clean driver for the isp116x (at least as
clean as you can make this device). This may in the end be the best
approach, but for now I have adapted Lothar's driver to the 116x in the
following way different from Olav's last patch:
The way I see it, the isp1362 in
Hi,
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Torsten Koschorrek wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> > Olav mentioned perhaps rewriting the driver, based on the new
> > sl811-hcd driver, which I agree is a better solution.
> >
Yes, I am working on a simpler 116x driver. The driver is
not functional yet, but the work is progr
Michael wrote:
Olav mentioned perhaps rewriting the driver, based on the new
sl811-hcd driver, which I agree is a better solution.
Yes, he want's to write it only for the 116x, as far as I read and
understood it. I think, it would be a very good idea to write TWO
drivers, one for the 116x and one f
