On 6/12/07, Peter Korsgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant == Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Grant Rather than c67x00-hub.c being compiled seperately, the
Grant original code had c67x00-hub.c *included* by c67x00-hcd.c.
Grant This is a very bad idea. Simplest solution is to
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Grant Likely wrote:
On 6/13/07, Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Grant Likely wrote:
On 6/12/07, Peter Korsgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant == Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Grant Rather than c67x00-hub.c
On 6/13/07, Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Grant Likely wrote:
On 6/13/07, Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Grant Likely wrote:
On 6/12/07, Peter Korsgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant == Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Grant Likely wrote:
I think we're crossing wires here. In this particular case, I think
the hub support code is sufficiently small that it doesn't need to be
split off into a separate file. (It's only 180 lines) I'm not
suggesting that the hub support stuff be moved to
Grant == Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Grant Rather than c67x00-hub.c being compiled seperately, the
Grant original code had c67x00-hub.c *included* by c67x00-hcd.c.
Grant This is a very bad idea. Simplest solution is to merge the
Grant two files into one and be done with it.
