> > On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 11:49 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > I don't have access to a machine running Windows.
> > > But, I took the device to the office today and tried it on a machine
> > > running FC2 also. It worked flawlessly. Here at home I'm connecting to
> > > RoadRunner (high
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 19:11 -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
> David Hollis wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 12:44 -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
> > > This might be a stupid question, but you aren't changing the MAC address
> > > of
> > > the nic at one place and not at the other?
> >
> >
> > Not really
David Hollis wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 12:44 -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
> > This might be a stupid question, but you aren't changing the MAC address of
> > the nic at one place and not at the other?
>
>
> Not really changing MAC addresses, though it does bring up a good point:
> I've often f
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 12:44 -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
> David Hollis wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 11:49 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > I don't have access to a machine running Windows.
> > > But, I took the device to the office today and tried it on a machine
> > > running FC2 also
David Hollis wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 11:49 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I don't have access to a machine running Windows.
> > But, I took the device to the office today and tried it on a machine
> > running FC2 also. It worked flawlessly. Here at home I'm connecting to
> > RoadRunn
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 11:49 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't have access to a machine running Windows.
> But, I took the device to the office today and tried it on a machine
> running FC2 also. It worked flawlessly. Here at home I'm connecting to
> RoadRunner (high speed cable). Is that t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Jamie Painter wrote:
I have a Fedora Core 3 system with kernel 2.6.10-1.760_FC3smp. My
usb200M works fine, both with the "stock" usbnet and the patched
version. The patched version has about double the throughput on
receives. My ethtool and mii-tool
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Jamie Painter wrote:
> I have a Fedora Core 3 system with kernel 2.6.10-1.760_FC3smp. My
> usb200M works fine, both with the "stock" usbnet and the patched
> version. The patched version has about double the throughput on
> receives. My ethtool and mii-tool output are app
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, David Hollis wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 19:25 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > I applied the patch you suggested to 2.6.10 and rebuilt. It didn't seem to
> > make any difference, just no communication. I even tried 2.6.11-rc4 with
> > the same results.
> > >
> > >
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, David Hollis wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 14:41 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Could someone give me a hint how to trouble shoot this.
> > About all I can say is it doesn't work. When I plug it in the usb
> > subsystem recognises the device and creates ethX. It just d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, David Hollis wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 14:41 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone give me a hint how to trouble shoot this.
About all I can say is it doesn't work. When I plug it in the usb
subsystem recognises the device and creates
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 19:25 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I applied the patch you suggested to 2.6.10 and rebuilt. It didn't seem to
> make any difference, just no communication. I even tried 2.6.11-rc4 with
> the same results.
> >
> > You may also want to send the output from /sbin/mii-too
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 14:41 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Could someone give me a hint how to trouble shoot this.
> About all I can say is it doesn't work. When I plug it in the usb
> subsystem recognises the device and creates ethX. It just doesn't
> communicate. I have a 3Com card that works
13 matches
Mail list logo
