Duncan SANDS wrote:
Thanks for your vote of confidence!
As I said, the final vote comes from the linux-usb project leaders. They
will have to work with you :)
I am glad someone is willing to take it over. It was just a play thingie
when I started it, but now it reminds me too strongly of a d
> >Dear Johan, I am sorry to hear that you will no longer be maintaining the
>speedtouch driver. It may have been your
> >first linux kernel driver, and it may have had a few bugs, but it has done good
>service to me and others. I am willing
> >to try and maintain the driver. While I don't hav
Duncan SANDS wrote:
Dear Johan, I am sorry to hear that you will no longer be maintaining the speedtouch driver. It may have been your
first linux kernel driver, and it may have had a few bugs, but it has done good service to me and others. I am willing
to try and maintain the driver. While I
> First of all thank you for getting this driver in the kernel and getting it looked
>over for bugs. The code is about two and a
> half years with no changes in the last 1.5 or two years or so. Judging by the bugs
>found, it doesn't seem too bad for my
> first linux kernel driver :) I tried to
Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2002 06:19 schrieb Duncan SANDS:
Hi Oliver, I think the driver should really be converted to using a
workqueue instead.
If it were a new driver of course.
But the current approach works in principle. As I am not the driver's
maintainer, I jus
Am Mittwoch, 18. Dezember 2002 06:19 schrieb Duncan SANDS:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this makes sure that the kernel thread is dead and gone on module unload.
> >
> > Regards
> > Oliver
>
> Hi Oliver, I think the driver should really be converted to using a
> workqueue instead.
If it were a
> Hi,
>
> this makes sure that the kernel thread is dead and gone on module unload.
>
> Regards
> Oliver
Hi Oliver, I think the driver should really be converted to using a workqueue
instead.
All the best,
Duncan.
---
Thi
