Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-12 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:00:29AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > > But do please add the EHCI patch I posted yesterday, too. :) > > > > I don't see that at all. Did you CC: me? > > No, wainted confirmation from Colin that it worked first: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-11 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 11:36:27AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > Greg: > > When you work on accepting and merging patches, do you use a single tree > for all the changes or do you have separate trees for usb, pci, i2c, and > so on? If you use a single tree then there's no real choice but to export >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-10 Thread Christopher Li
I think it is not going to matter very soon because Linus's git is going to take over the syncing problem. I spend the whole afternoon playing with the git package it is very cool! I predict we will soon be pulling from the usb.git tree and solve all the version and syncing problem, the infrastruc

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-09 Thread David Brownell
> > But do please add the EHCI patch I posted yesterday, too. :) > > I don't see that at all. Did you CC: me? No, wainted confirmation from Colin that it worked first: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=111281753127281&w=2 It's attached here. - Dave Miscellaneous updates for

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-09 Thread Alan Stern
Greg: When you work on accepting and merging patches, do you use a single tree for all the changes or do you have separate trees for usb, pci, i2c, and so on? If you use a single tree then there's no real choice but to export all the patches together -- cherry-picking the subsets will inevitably

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-08 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:59:37AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 07 April 2005 1:58 am, Greg KH wrote: > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/ > > > > Does this work out for everyone? I'll get Andrew to pull in the patches > > into the -mm trees, a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-08 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 03:13:48PM -0400, Christopher Li wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:58:29AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > - provide raw quilt directory of patches (like the directory > > > above has in it.) > > > - nightly

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-08 Thread Christopher Li
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:05:28PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > Or, if Greg has incremental patch usb1-to-usb2.patch. > > You can "quilt pop" to reach "rc2-usb1", then "quilt fold < > > usb1-to-usb2.patch". > > So you have usb2 now. > > > > Do "quilt push" again to your continue "usb-hack"

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-08 Thread Christopher Li
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 07:40:57PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 07 April 2005 12:35 pm, Christopher Li wrote: > > > Let me explain how I see quilt can fit in. We have base line: > > > > linux-2.6.11.tar.gz untar to linux/ > > > > series file: > > linux-2.6.12-rc2.patch # Linus's r

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 22:05:28 -0400 (EDT) Alan Stern wrote: | On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Christopher Li wrote: | | > So now when you what to do a "bk pull", you go out and see Greg has any | > new patch on the site or not. If there is, grab it and reapply it. | > (after using your local quilt pop out all

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 07 April 2005 12:35 pm, Christopher Li wrote: > Let me explain how I see quilt can fit in. We have base line: > > linux-2.6.11.tar.gz untar to linux/ > > series file: > linux-2.6.12-rc2.patch # Linus's rc2 patch > linux-2.6.12-rc2-usb1.patch # Greg's usb1 patch for rc2 > chris-usb-h

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Christopher Li wrote: > So now when you what to do a "bk pull", you go out and see Greg has any > new patch on the site or not. If there is, grab it and reapply it. > (after using your local quilt pop out all the patches first.) > Of course, you can make a automatic. Maybe we c

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Christopher Li
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 03:22:51PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > > And will you be sure to post a message informing us every time > > > something like that happens? > > > > Why? I never did that before. > > It was never necessary before. Changes to the gre

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Christopher Li
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:58:29AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > - provide raw quilt directory of patches (like the directory > > above has in it.) > > - nightly provide a patch against the latest kernel tree for the > > dif

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > And will you be sure to post a message informing us every time > > something like that happens? > > Why? I never did that before. It was never necessary before. Changes to the gregkh-2.6 BK tree were always monotonic and I could synchronize simply by doin

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 07 April 2005 1:58 am, Greg KH wrote: > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/ > > Does this work out for everyone? I'll get Andrew to pull in the patches > into the -mm trees, and people can see if their patches are applied or > not properly, and peop

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:38:23AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > Ok, I've now done both of these. At: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/ > > you can see a full usb, i2c, and so on patches, that are generated from > > my q

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > Ok, I've now done both of these. At: > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/ > you can see a full usb, i2c, and so on patches, that are generated from > my quilt series of patches. In the patches/ subdirectory, is my raw > qui

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > - provide raw quilt directory of patches (like the directory > above has in it.) > - nightly provide a patch against the latest kernel tree for the > different projects I keep track of (usb, i2c, pci, driver >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-07 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 11:37:38PM -0700, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > Christopher Li wrote: > > I am a long time happy quilt user. > > Took me a while to find the quilt home page... there's a lot of software > out there called quilt. > > Quilt looks pretty neat to me... > > Greg, any reason you picke

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-06 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Christopher Li wrote: > I am a long time happy quilt user. Took me a while to find the quilt home page... there's a lot of software out there called quilt. Quilt looks pretty neat to me... Greg, any reason you picked quilt over the other various alternatives? Personally I like systems based arou

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-06 Thread Christopher Li
I am a long time happy quilt user. On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 02:26:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > I realize this isn't the best way to handle this so far, and I know it > isn't workable. I'm thinking of doing something like the following: > > - provide raw quilt directory of patches (like t

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-06 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 02:54:02PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Wednesday 06 April 2005 2:26 pm, Greg KH wrote: > > > I'm thinking of doing something like the following: > > > > - provide raw quilt directory of patches (like the directory > > above has in it.) > > - nightly pr

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-06 Thread David Brownell
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 2:26 pm, Greg KH wrote: > I'm thinking of doing something like the following: > > - provide raw quilt directory of patches (like the directory > above has in it.) > - nightly provide a patch against the latest kernel tree for the > different

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-06 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 04:58:24PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > > > As per the comments about BitKeeper on lkml, I will not have a usb bk > > tree anymore. I've switched over to using quilt, and will expose that > > patchset for everyone to see in some form so t

Re: [linux-usb-devel] no more usb bk trees

2005-04-06 Thread Alan Stern
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote: > As per the comments about BitKeeper on lkml, I will not have a usb bk > tree anymore. I've switched over to using quilt, and will expose that > patchset for everyone to see in some form so that people can keep up to > date with my tree. An initial dump of the