On Fri, 27 May 2005 21:25:36 -0700 David Brownell wrote:
| On Friday 27 May 2005 6:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Thu, 26 May 2005, David Brownell wrote:
| On Thursday 26 May 2005 8:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Ever since 2.6.11 I can't get usbnet to load and recognize my Zaurus
|
Hello,
in 2.6.12-rc5 the problem is not present. All my USB-Storage Device works
with this kernel...
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Mittwoch, den 25. Mai 2005:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4291
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-25 15:24
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 4:40 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear usb developers, dear Andrew!
I found that my builtin sd card reader connected via USB port
experiences several connect/reconnect cycles every time I boot.
Did we end up deciding
On Saturday 21 May 2005 12:14 am, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:07:15AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2005 02:08:47 -0400, Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] It's not a correct fix, but due to time constraints
(and paranoia) I'm opting for the
On Friday 27 May 2005 10:27 am, Alan Stern wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2005, David Brownell wrote:
Actually I'm not so sure. I generally describe USB_SUSPEND as relating
to whether or not the USB suspend state is used ...
Then how come the hub_suspend and hub_resume methods in hub.c
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:38 am, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
The itd_patch() function is responsible for allocating entries in the
buffer page pointer list of the iTD. Particularly, a new page pointer
is needed every time when buffer data crosses a page boundary.
However, there is a bug in the
Hello,
While trying to write a linux driver for my USB device on kernel 2.4.30, I
noticed that doing an usb_unlink_urb on a bulk IN endpoint, and then
submitting a new urb later, causes the next packet of data on that
endpoint to be lost. I see the packet on my USB bus analyzer, but I don't
get
