* Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I mentioned it on LKML, you probably didn't get it, sorry:
nforce2 with ehci, some reported he doesn't have this problem with
ohci (but I really don't want to do backups over USB 1.1).
I'm not sure if you also got the error forwarded:
host_reset requested
Robert L. Harris wrote:
Thus spake Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:44:25PM -0400, Robert L. Harris wrote:
Bus 001 Device 004: ID 04e6:0704 SCM Microsystems, Inc.
cannot get string descriptor 1, error = Broken pipe(32)
cannot get string descriptor 2, error = Broken
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, David Brownell wrote:
Alan Stern wrote:
I've got a plan for reorganizing usb_reset_device(),
usb_set_configuration(), and parts of the hub driver and core. ..
Before doing any real programming, I wanted to get some feedback to see if
this plan makes any sense.
I'll get that to you tomorrow. Do you want it for both the working and
broken configs?
Thus spake Alan Stern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Robert L. Harris wrote:
Ok, it's not broken hardware on my Archos usb-storage or Sony Clie. I
just compiled 2.4.22-rc1-ac1 as a test
Oliver Neukum wrote:
Is this error
drivers/usb/class/usblp.c: usblp0: nonzero read/write bulk status received: -104
repeatable?
Yes. Looks as if once/reboot (I've just checked my logs); with
-test2-bk2 and -test3.
Were you the whom I sent the diagnostic which which gave no
ChangeSet 1.1119.1.11, 2003/08/06 16:02:01-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] USB: usbnet, prevent exotic rtnl deadlock
Turns out that when PM is in use, some D3cold resume paths
could have one thread, holding the network lock, deadlock
in flush_scheduled_work() since an event task is waiting
for
ChangeSet 1.1119.1.4, 2003/08/06 15:50:53-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] USB: usb-storage: Move static string out of initializers.h
This patch seems to have fallen through the cracks. It takes a string
constant defined as a macro in initializers.h and instead makes it a
static string in
Thanks Oliver - I can confirm this patch does fix printing...excellent!
Here are the log messages, in case they're of any use. This is worth getting
into linux-2.4.22-pre/rc, I think.
Many thanks,
Daniel
--- [ printer attached ]
Aug 10 12:48:29 stratum kernel: usb 2-1: new device strings:
Dear List,
I am writing you because I want to develop a driver
that manages the communication between 2 computers
using a bidireccional usb 1.0 cable, but i the usb
documentation I have read I find how to write driver
that connect usb ports to devices but not between 2
computers unsing only
If hcd_endpoint_disable() is called at the same time that an URB is
submitted for that endpoint, there is a nasty race.
hcd_endpoint_disable() sets the endpoint maxpacket size to 0, in order to
prevent further submissions. But meanwhile, the HC driver is trying to
packetize the original request
Am Sonntag, 10. August 2003 17:40 schrieb Alan Stern:
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Oliver Neukum wrote:
I'm not sure about your first example. Configuration changes would take
place immediately under my scheme, but unbinding the old interface drivers
and probing the new interfaces would be
It does seem that it's the usblp driver, and I think the way forward is to
collect more information with compiling the driver with debugging to see more
of what's happening here. I'll do this tonight and report findings.
The module author string is Michael Gee, Pavel Machek, Vojtech Pavlik,
Randy
Am Sonntag, 10. August 2003 18:18 schrieb Changwoo Ryu:
Hi,
I'm trying to reverse-engineer a USB remote control receiver.
Fortunately the receiver consists of 1 configuration/1 interface/1
interrupt-input endpoint, and no additional setting is required to read
remote control signals from
* David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-usersm=105886063115712
w=2
That report wasn't very helpful. I recommend reviewing the
How do I report a bug? FAQ at www.linux-usb.org next time,
and for now forward:
Sorry for that, someone on usb-users told me
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Fridtjof Busse wrote:
On Friday 08 August 2003 23:15, Alan Stern wrote:
Also, maybe a change in the host controller driver is responsible. I
don't think you mentioned which host driver you're running?
I mentioned it on LKML, you probably didn't get it, sorry:
David:
This question is somewhat theoretical; I don't expect it to come up. But
I'm curious.
Do the slave controller drivers maintain message boundaries for bulk-out
endpoints, even if the gadget's request size doesn't match the host's
packet size? Or do they simply wait until enough data is
Thus spake Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:44:25PM -0400, Robert L. Harris wrote:
Bus 001 Device 004: ID 04e6:0704 SCM Microsystems, Inc.
cannot get string descriptor 1, error = Broken pipe(32)
cannot get string descriptor 2, error = Broken pipe(32)
cannot get
Am Sonntag, 10. August 2003 21:39 schrieb Alan Stern:
Oliver:
You've been doing a lot of auditing of the USB drivers. Here's a
potential problem I've never had a chance to look for -- maybe you've run
across an occurrence.
The problem is that usb_unlink_urb() without the ASYNC flag set
This message was created automatically by mail delivery
software. A message that you sent could not be delivered
to all of its recipients.
The following message, addressed to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
failed because it has not been collected after 31 days
Here is a copy of the first part of the
19 matches
Mail list logo
