Re: [Libusb-devel] Re: [Linux-usb-users] Next step in reverse engineering USB robot

2004-01-27 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Douglas S. Blank wrote: > But we can't get the most basic pieces of the URB's figured out. If you > can help, please send me a hint. I'm not sure at what level your problem lies. Is it using libusb itself or is it what to tell libusb to do? I've tried to read th

Re: [Libusb-devel] Re: [Linux-usb-users] Next step in reverse engineering USB robot

2004-01-26 Thread Douglas S. Blank
Ged Haywood wrote: Hi there, On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Pedro M. wrote: I love this idea of USB / Linux Robot ( well a WIFI robot is OK too ). Where there is a starting website about it ??.. http://www.google.com The words "linux robot" gave me just under 300,000 hits and when I added "usb" that took i

Re: [Linux-usb-users] Next step in reverse engineering USB robot

2004-01-23 Thread Steve Bangert
http://usb-robot.sourceforge.net/ Steve On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 11:26, Pedro M. wrote: > I love this idea of USB / Linux Robot ( well a WIFI robot is OK too ). > > Where there is a starting website about it ??.. > > Regards. --- The SF.Net

Re: [Linux-usb-users] Next step in reverse engineering USB robot

2004-01-23 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Pedro M. wrote: > I love this idea of USB / Linux Robot ( well a WIFI robot is OK too ). > > Where there is a starting website about it ??.. http://www.google.com The words "linux robot" gave me just under 300,000 hits and when I added "usb" that took it down to

Re: [Linux-usb-users] Next step in reverse engineering USB robot

2004-01-23 Thread Pedro M.
ary 22, 2004 7:56 PM Subject: Re: [Linux-usb-users] Next step in reverse engineering USB robot > No one knows how to generate the following URBs using libusb, or any > other protocol? I suspect it can be done with a call to > usb_control_msg(), but I have no idea how. > >

Re: [Linux-usb-users] Next step in reverse engineering USB robot

2004-01-22 Thread Douglas S. Blank
No one knows how to generate the following URBs using libusb, or any other protocol? I suspect it can be done with a call to usb_control_msg(), but I have no idea how. This is a dump from usbsnoopy under Windows: 140

Re: [Linux-usb-users] Next step in reverse engineering USB robot

2004-01-18 Thread Jeff Macfarland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The question I have is how to take the data from the URBs shown below, and turn that into usb_control_msg() call. How does the VENDOR_DEVICE and CONTROL_TRANSFER URBs get generated in libusb, or some other protocol? How do you send the setup packet of the VENDOR_DEVICE?

Re: [Linux-usb-users] Next step in reverse engineering USB robot

2004-01-18 Thread dblank
The question I have is how to take the data from the URBs shown below, and turn that into usb_control_msg() call. How does the VENDOR_DEVICE and CONTROL_TRANSFER URBs get generated in libusb, or some other protocol? How do you send the setup packet of the VENDOR_DEVICE? If someone could transl

Re: [Linux-usb-users] Next step in reverse engineering USB robot

2004-01-18 Thread Matthew Dharm
I'm no USB-Snoopy expert, but I think you may only have 139 packets. They're not really 'packets' -- they're URBs (USB Request Blocks). Each URB specifies a transfer (to or from the device) of a certain type (control, bulk, interrupt, or iso). What I imagine you're seeing is that the 'robot' dri

[Linux-usb-users] Next step in reverse engineering USB robot

2004-01-18 Thread dblank
Ok, thanks to this group I have been snoopying a USB-based robot. I see that when I plug the USB in under Windows with the proprietary device handler in place, 278 packets are sent back and forth (139 ups + 139 downs). I suspect that there are some config data being set in that first 139 packets.