On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, RTE wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 07:39:13 +0300, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > You might also want to test this patch. It should automatically set
> > max_sectors to 64 -- that's lower than you need but it should work
> > without errors. (The patch is against 2.6.24-rc3, so you m
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 07:39:13 +0300, Alan Stern wrote:
> You might also want to test this patch. It should automatically set
> max_sectors to 64 -- that's lower than you need but it should work
> without errors. (The patch is against 2.6.24-rc3, so you may have to
> merge it by hand into the sour
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, RTE wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:26:26 +0300, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Okay, here's a version of the patch for 2.6.23 and without the
> > debugging information.
>
> Many thanks to you for the help! :)
> In 2.6.23 patch works perfectly. Errors are not present.
>
> > My guess
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:26:26 +0300, Alan Stern wrote:
> Okay, here's a version of the patch for 2.6.23 and without the
> debugging information.
Many thanks to you for the help! :)
In 2.6.23 patch works perfectly. Errors are not present.
> My guess is that if you decrease max_sectors to 184 (to ma
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, RTE wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:17:17 +0300, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > Below is another test patch for 2.6.17-git22. It includes new code to
> > try and fix the problem.
>
> it works :)
> no errors in the copied data
Great!
Okay, here's a version of the patch for 2.6.23
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:17:17 +0300, Alan Stern wrote:
> Below is another test patch for 2.6.17-git22. It includes new code to
> try and fix the problem.
it works :)
no errors in the copied data
2.6.17-git22 with patch
after copying 700 MB file from flash to HDD
/var/log/kernel/info:
23:22:02 l
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, RTE wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:31:20 +0300, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > Okay, that's good. Now here's a comparable patch for 2.6.17-git22
>
>
> 2.6.17-git22 with patch
> after copying 700 MB file from flash to HDD
> the copied file contains errors
> /var/log/kernel/info:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:31:20 +0300, Alan Stern wrote:
> Okay, that's good. Now here's a comparable patch for 2.6.17-git22
2.6.17-git22 with patch
after copying 700 MB file from flash to HDD
the copied file contains errors
/var/log/kernel/info:
19:49:01 localhost kernel: usb 5-8: new high speed
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, RTE wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:18:11 +0400, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like you to try some more experiments
>
> sorry for the long period of silence - not enough free time :(
>
> 2.6.17-git21 whith patch
> after copying 700 MB file from flash to HDD
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:18:11 +0400, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like you to try some more experiments
sorry for the long period of silence - not enough free time :(
2.6.17-git21 whith patch
after copying 700 MB file from flash to HDD
errors in the copied file are not present
/var
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Okay. That narrows it down to a single patch, this one:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=03aba2f79594ca94d159c8bab454de9bcc385b76
>
> There's a weir
Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay. That narrows it down to a single patch, this one:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=03aba2f79594ca94d159c8bab454de9bcc385b76
There's a weird line in this patch:
- if (scsi_end_request(
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, RTE wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:39:40 +0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > There's a good chance that your problem isn't caused by anything in the
> > USB stack, but rather by a change somewhere else.
>
> I did not use Git (150 MB is too much for my unstable internet connectio
> Do you use Bluetooth or have the hci_usb module loaded?
No, I don't
> It's possible for you to get hold of the individual patches between
> those two kernel versions, so you can try to figure out exactly which
> one was responsible for the problem.
OK, I'll try it.
--
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, RTE wrote:
> > How about the various kernels between 2.6.17 and 2.6.18-rc1:
> > 2.6.17-git1 through 2.6.17-git9? You can find the various sources,
> > patches, and incremental patches under
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/
>
> Thanks for
> How about the various kernels between 2.6.17 and 2.6.18-rc1:
> 2.6.17-git1 through 2.6.17-git9? You can find the various sources,
> patches, and incremental patches under
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/old/
Thanks for help.
It seems that I have localized the pro
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, RTE wrote:
> > Do you encounter actual read errors (that is, error messages in the
> > system log), or do you find that the reads appear to succeed but return
> > incorrect data?
> Yes, the reads succeed but return incorrect data
>
> > If you write data under 2.6.22 and then
> Do you encounter actual read errors (that is, error messages in the
> system log), or do you find that the reads appear to succeed but return
> incorrect data?
Yes, the reads succeed but return incorrect data
> If you write data under 2.6.22 and then read it back with 2.6.17, does
> it come out
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007, RTE wrote:
> 1GB USB2.0 Flash Drive Transcend TS1GJF2A
> Motherboard ASUS P4P800 SE (Intel 865PE)
>
> Windows XP- works fine
> Linux 2.6.17 - works fine
> Linux 2.6.18 - 2.6.22.3 - writes fine, reads with errors (wrong crc, md5
> mismatch, etc.)
> Tested on Fedora Core 6 and
19 matches
Mail list logo
