Re: Benchmarking under Linux - A very black art. Was Re: eeePCdiskspeeds. Was Re: Acer Aspire One netbook

2009-03-02 Thread John Carter
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Steve Holdoway wrote: Noo... you should always sync twice: disk then network (: ( and anyone who says 3 times is even older than me! ) So it's my age eh? So is why I always unmount my usb pens like... sync;sync;sync;umount /dev/sdc I just said sync instead of sync;sync

Re: Benchmarking under Linux - A very black art. Was Re: eeePCdiskspeeds. Was Re: Acer Aspire One netbook

2009-03-02 Thread John Carter
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Craig Falconer wrote: John Carter wrote, On 02/03/09 17:19: On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Craig Falconer wrote: time dd if=/dev/zero of=/file.dd bs=16k count=16k onto sda (4GB) that took 11.34 seconds (27.9 MB/sec) However onto sdb it took 55.93 seconds (4.8 MB/sec) time dd

Re: Benchmarking under Linux - A very black art. Was Re: eeePCdiskspeeds. Was Re: Acer Aspire One netbook

2009-03-02 Thread Craig Falconer
John Carter wrote, On 03/03/09 11:02: Sigh! Since I can think of several places where a gut feel for these numbers will help me in the work context, eg. I'm in the process of spec'ing a server for a build system... it will help me to get a grip on the current realitys of shifting data around.

Re: Benchmarking under Linux - A very black art. Was Re: eeePCdiskspeeds. Was Re: Acer Aspire One netbook

2009-03-02 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:02:08 +1300 (NZDT) John Carter john.car...@tait.co.nz wrote: [loads of interesting real data] Can you confirm that mb, Mb, and MB are all interchangeable, and are MegaBytes? My brain hurts! Steve -- Steve Holdoway st...@greengecko.co.nz http://www.greengecko.co.nz