On Sunday 10 March 2002 8:08 am, Keith Antoine wrote:
On Sunday 10 March 2002 05:26 pm, you wrote:
Pam
see there is a kdesupport in the unsatble cvs, should I use that ?? just to
a normal configure make with that one ?
That will certainly work if you have updated autoconf etc., I don't
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 12:08:08 +0800, Chang[linuxism] wrote:
given the following directory structure:
/home
/home/httpd/html
/home/httpd/html/linux-sxs
/home/httpd/icons
Is it possible to tar backup everything in /home except
/home/httpd/html/linux-sxs?
I tried:
tar cvzfp
On Sunday 10 March 2002 09:20 pm, you wrote:
On Sunday 10 March 2002 10:03 am, Keith Antoine wrote:
On Sunday 10 March 2002 05:26 pm, you wrote:
Your reccomendations grandma please g
I have d/l both rc2 and cvs should I use the cvs with kdesupport or go
with RC2 and use support from
oops.. that should be /tmp/exclude. sorry.
I found the * was not needed when using -T option.
So I didn't attempt it on the -X option.
Lemme try... no ..didn't work... :(
I will attach the full script
Anita Lewis wrote:
Is it possible to tar backup everything in /home except
ook?
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info,
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:12, Harry G wrote:
Where do I go from here?
with regard to the subject line and not the content (which somehow got
changed to burning cd's) the answer is, that on your setup your cd-roms are
scsi devices and will be named EITHER
/dev/scd0 and 1
OR
/dev/sr0 and 1
OR
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:17, M. Peck Dickens wrote:
It really pisses me off that the developers of sane would
rather add new features than fix this major bug.
nah. Why break with tradition from these people?
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 10:16:26 -0500 Brian Witowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I get this message in my log file. I have check the link and the file
pointed to doesn't exist. I never poke around that directory so I think
it's unlikely that I deleted it. The system runs normally in every
other
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002 14:10, dep wrote:
anyone used the ibm wepbphere hp builder? impressions? i'm given to
yep.
it relies on wine, which version , dunno, don't care. As a site
managment tool it is very similar in structure and layout to Quanta+
(and probably better) but unfortunately, sadly,
Run nslookup SomeInternetSite
If you get a non-authoritative comment, it is caching. You may have to to
this twice.
Joel
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 08:52:05PM -0500, Brian Witowski wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a bind caching server. The problem is when I do an ndc
dumpdb then check the dump file,
Jerry McBride wrote:
It's not required for running your linux computer. However, it will shut
up that error message.
It is, afaik, only used during kernel oops tracing.
Someone recently gave an *excellent* description of the various System.map's,
plural, their order of precedence, and
Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
Thanks, Lonni.
I tell what I've done: Reverted to the pre-latest RH kernel 2.4.9-21, skipped
If you ever want to move away from the somewhat dated rh kernel releases the
'trick' is to download a pristine kernel, or patch (as appropriate) and modify
the following
Follow the instructions in this url. It assumes you're using sendmail as
your mta.
http://sdb.suse.de/en/sdb/html/sendmail_smtp_auth.html
Gerry
Yahoo have changed their smtp so that it must be 'authenticated'. I am
able to send via Netscape, but Kmail falls over with a reject response
Is anyone using the new iMAC on a network with linux servers (dhcp,samba,
gateway)?
My wife's win98 box is dying, along with the monitor. This might be a
nice time to buy an apple. She will not use linux since it won't run AOL.
However, I would like to dump one more windows box in my house.
Well, the thing is, while Macs can do SAMBA, they'll natively do
AppleTalk. Linux will do both, although SMB support is far more mature.
Have you considered perhaps installing something like Yellow Dog Linux
on the Mac, and then running MOL (Mac on Linux), which is basically
Win4Lin for Macs,
Also sprach Mike Andrew on Sunday 10 March 2002 18:40:
If you ever want to move away from the somewhat dated rh kernel releases
the 'trick' is to download a pristine kernel, or patch (as appropriate) and
modify the following line in /usr/src/linux/Makefile
EXTRAVERSION(space)=(space) -1
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Joel Hammer wrote:
Is anyone using the new iMAC on a network with linux servers (dhcp,samba,
gateway)?
My wife's win98 box is dying, along with the monitor. This might be a
nice time to buy an apple. She will not use linux since it won't run AOL.
However, I would
On Sunday 10 March 2002 11:28 am,Joel Hammer wrote:
Is anyone using the new iMAC on a network with linux servers
(dhcp,samba, gateway)?
My wife's win98 box is dying, along with the monitor. This might be a
nice time to buy an apple. She will not use linux since it won't run
AOL.
I don't
--- Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 10 March 2002 11:28 am,Joel Hammer wrote:
Is anyone using the new iMAC on a network with linux servers
(dhcp,samba, gateway)?
My wife's win98 box is dying, along with the monitor. This might be
a
nice time to buy an apple. She will
There is no way my wife will dump her AOL email.
Joel
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 02:34:23PM -0800, Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Sunday 10 March 2002 11:28 am,Joel Hammer wrote:
Is anyone using the new iMAC on a network with linux servers
(dhcp,samba, gateway)?
My wife's win98 box is dying, along
Uninstalling AOL from the computer will do the trick.
--- Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no way my wife will dump her AOL email.
Joel
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 02:34:23PM -0800, Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Sunday 10 March 2002 11:28 am,Joel Hammer wrote:
Is anyone using the new
In part it can. But, it is not nearly as convenient as using AOL itself. I
have tried this, BTW, in my attempt to get her off windows. It was rejected.
Joel
There is no way my wife will dump her AOL email.
Joel
=
Can't AOL e-mail be managed via a web based
[This message has also been posted.]
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 15:20:16 -0800 (PST), Net Llama wrote:
Sure you could rebuild the kernel from Caldera's source, but i don't
know why you should waste time on it. For starters, Caldera's kernel is
_old_, very old. Why rebuild an old kernel that is
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 15:20:16 -0800 (PST), Net Llama wrote:
Sure you could rebuild the kernel from Caldera's source, but i don't
know why you should waste time on it. For starters, Caldera's kernel is
_old_, very old. Why rebuild an old kernel that is several months out
of date? Secondly,
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 19:16:06 -0500
Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled in frustration:
In part it can. But, it is not nearly as convenient as using AOL itself.
I have tried this, BTW, in my attempt to get her off windows. It was
rejected.
===
I guess dual
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 16:32:57 -0800 (PST)
Net Llama [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled in frustration:
I still haven't heard why your wife needs to use AOL email, other than
'because'.
=
You're married, llama. Wanna reconsider that question? ;o)
Mike
--
He may
I'm attempting to build XFree86-4.2.0 on a COL-3.1.1 box, and it seems
that all of the DRI components bombed out during the build (and then
later during the install).
This appears to be the common error:
gcc: ../../../../../../lib/GL/dri/drm/xf86drm.o: No such file or
directory
make[5]: ***
--- Anita Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 15:20:16 -0800 (PST), Net Llama wrote:
Sure you could rebuild the kernel from Caldera's source, but i don't
know why you should waste time on it. For starters, Caldera's
kernel is
_old_, very old. Why rebuild an old kernel
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 17:03:59 -0800 (PST)
Net Llama [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled impishly:
Point taken.
In all fairness, it did take me nearly 3 years to convince my wife to
use Linux for day-to-day activities (internet stuff primarily). Of
course part of the campaign was that i simply refused
That is more or less where I am. But, my wife is persistent. She is also
working now and so its just her money she's spending.
Joel
In all fairness, it did take me nearly 3 years to convince my wife to
use Linux for day-to-day activities (internet stuff primarily). Of
course part of the
On my console the letter l and the number l appear identical. Very
bothersome, especially when editing something like a postscript file, where
I don't know from the context what it should be. Also a pain
in those big assigned passwords, etc.
Is there an easy why to make the console display these
http://www.linuxandmain.com
--
dep
Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day.
Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info,
What in the heck is email loops. Fruit loops or some thing?
Or is it one of those thingys that just you and your friends do hicky.
Sounds like it is time for some one to see the light here. I knoq my wife has
screwed the pouch enough here, I tell her what to do, she listens if she has
a mind
On Monday 11 March 2002 12:46 pm, you wrote:
http://www.linuxandmain.com
Jeez and they also le a Mike someone write an article for them ??
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer,
Mike
I read your article in the Linux domain or C++ Object
Oriented domain. I am extremely hard pressed to find anything to argue against.
I have felt all along they are too few Software developers and far too many
people writing code who have no idea of what they are doing. This also
35 matches
Mail list logo
