Hi All,
Redhat.com seems to be really slow with the downloads... it took al night to
get 180mb down on the first iso so I cancelled where is another mirror that
provides a better bandwidth
--
James McDonald
Systems Engineer
Public key (824785B3) available at http://www.keyserver.net/
ftp://ftp.nhctc.edu.tw/iso/Linux/RedHat/psyche-i386-disc1.iso
ftp://ftp.nhctc.edu.tw/iso/Linux/RedHat/psyche-i386-disc2.iso
ftp://ftp.nhctc.edu.tw/iso/Linux/RedHat/psyche-i386-disc3.iso
ftp://linux.nctu.edu.tw/iso/redhat/psyche-i386-disc1.iso
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 08:43:56AM +0800, m.w.chang wrote:
make bootstrap should have a step that do the tsets. read
the install/INSTALL file.
make bootstrap only does basic comparisons between the stage 2
and stage 3 compiler.
]# make -k test
make -k check
Kurt
--
People will accept your
I had the best luck with http://sunsite.utk.edu/ftp/pub/linux/redhat/
James McDonald wrote:
Hi All,
Redhat.com seems to be really slow with the downloads... it took al night to
get 180mb down on the first iso so I cancelled where is another mirror that
provides a better bandwidth
On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 21:50:47 -0500
J. Allen Crider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using a editor called Crisp, looks a lot like a
windows product. But runs very nice in linux. The big draw
back is that it has a $150.00 price tag. It does has M$, Linux,
Unix and Mac versions. I have used
I duuno, Keith. I am having MOJO problems with SuSe 8.1 as well. It
seems it has borken
just about EVERTHING.
Example: developeing in AppGen I use an xterm sesssion (Hey no GUI for
me !!!). 50% of the time
when exiting Appgen and going BACK to the xterm, xterm goes into a
RACE conidtion an
Weirdness going on over here. I've got a brand new E450, we purchased 6 disks for it,
bought the extra RAID controller. I've got the controller and disks in the thing. But
only disks 1-4 are recognized. Disks 5 and 6 are on the second RAID controller and are
not recognized. Sorta.
From the
Two questions...
If we're talking hardware RAID, don't all the disks in the array usually
have to be connected to the same RAID controller?
Is the standard SCSI bus in the E450 a RAID controller? (And if so, why
did you have to buy a second one?)
At 09:40 AM 10/8/02 -0400, DOUGLAS HUNLEY
That just tells me how to set up pcmcia, which I _don't_ have a problem
with. As I said, the card is recognized, installs the proper modules, but
just doesn't get an interface. I have symlinked to the yast created eth1
for the wireless and have gotten a little further along, but still no
cigar.
On Tuesday 08 October 2002 8:19 am, Ben Duncan wrote:
Yast INSISTS that I install Cups and Cups and nothing BUT Cups for
printing, even though
I have a library of LPRng printfilters I use for AppGen. I can not
remove ANY of the
/usr/share/doc/packages documentation (Which is NOW over 1.2GB),
Long reply; my apologies
m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no. not 'make'. `make bootstrap`
linux-sxs.org has an article on compiling gcc. read it first.
it worked for me.
Uhm, Sorry to ask, but where is this article? I've looked at the
SXS site in Alberta, but I'm afraid I'm somewhat lost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Wunder spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
BTW2, are you doing things to the headers of mail messages that cause
Mozilla to be unable to thread things properly? I BCC myself on messages
I send from work (so I have sent mail copies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
m.w.chang spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
yet your article on adding spam and virus filters for sendmail MILTER
was about using perl -MCPAN -e shell, rgiht? that's my next step after I
figured out glibc.
yeah. only so other peolpe
Yeah, seems a common complaint now is even the latest, greatest from
Redhack and
Mondain are reporting in with the same errors. Seems to be related to
the new stuff
being compiled with GCC 3.2 ??? I also got the source for xterm and
LPRng and
the tools, compiled from source. Things still are
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, James McDonald wrote:
Hi All,
Redhat.com seems to be really slow with the downloads... it took al night to
get 180mb down on the first iso so I cancelled where is another mirror that
provides a better bandwidth
From a listing on the psyche-list.
http://www.linux-sxs.org section gcc on the sidebar
Uhm, Sorry to ask, but where is this article? I've looked at the
SXS site in Alberta, but I'm afraid I'm somewhat lost looking in
there. [digi something or other.. ]
caldera installed the gcc to /usr/bin and /usr/lib. So I followed.
I
Tim, I finally compiled and installed the proftpd-1.2.6. The sanity
check is really relate to glibc. steps taken:
install COL 3.1 (minimum setup)
remvoe the old one and install my binutils-2.13
remove old gcc-2.95.2 and install my gcc-2.95.3.rpm --replacefiles
remove all caldera libstdc++.rpm
On Tue, 08 Oct 2002 07:19:37 -0500 Ben Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I duuno, Keith. I am having MOJO problems with SuSe 8.1 as well. It
seems it has borken
just about EVERTHING.
Example: developeing in AppGen I use an xterm sesssion (Hey no GUI
for me !!!). 50% of the time
when
Keith Morse wrote:
From a listing on the psyche-list. ftp://redhat.newaol.com
I'm getting 180K/s using the above link.
Best
Peck
---
I need a new sig
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
well.. caldera's (at least COL 3.1) netkit-* tools compiled agsinst this
libdstdc++. is it necessary? I would try tor ecompile them using my new
gcc-2.95.3 and see for myself
is this librstdc++ really useless? I could find a simliar library name
in gcc's package
--
Swiftly.
it seems that this library is really useless.. could an expert confirm
my belief? :)
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/ v \
news://news.hkpcug.org /( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org
^ ^
m.w.chang wrote:
it seems that this library is really useless.. could an expert confirm
my belief? :)
Personally, I would leave libstdc++ library alone. It is used to
statically link c++ code.
Best
Peck
--
I still need a new sig...
___
why didn't it made part of gcc?
Personally, I would leave libstdc++ library alone. It is used to
statically link c++ code.
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/ v \
news://news.hkpcug.org /( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org
m.w.chang wrote:
why didn't it made part of gcc?
Personally, I would leave libstdc++ library alone. It is used to
statically link c++ code.
One lib is for creating static and is another for creating dynamic (Or
at least that's
the way I understand it...) Kurt is better qualified than
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Marvin Dickens wrote:
Keith Morse wrote:
From a listing on the psyche-list. ftp://redhat.newaol.com
I'm getting 180K/s using the above link.
Mike Harris, who posted the link, made the claim it couldn't be bogged
down. At a company, who I will soon have
25 matches
Mail list logo
