On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:40:22 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering why you're doing this in the first place. Why not just run
a uniproc kernel?
There are a few distros that deliver only SMP kernels. Our goal with a
distro is to try and use it out-of-the-box, making
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:32:24 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone seen this in Cringley´s column?
http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/06/16/24OPcringely_1.html
Don't think I'd want to take on both IBM and ATT at the same time in
different courtrooms, not even if I were
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:24:51 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
begin David A. Bandel's quote:
| Don't think I'd want to take on both IBM and ATT at the same time
| in different courtrooms, not even if I were M$. And SCO's not even
| close to that big.
my guess was that on about
I have an SuSE 7.1 distro, which I am not using. It was bought for testing
various distros but is not currently installed anywhere. I am looking to try
SuSE 8.2. If I buy an upgrade, will it only install on an existing 7.1, or
will it only ask for a CD to check that this is an upgrade? I don't
I remember seeing that redhat did some wild integration of KDE and Gnome in
their latest release. I never did get a feel for whether you could still
run KDE with its own look. Is this possible? If so, is it so without hassle?
--
++···+
·
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 04:13, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
I remember seeing that redhat did some wild integration of KDE and Gnome in
their latest release. I never did get a feel for whether you could still
run KDE with its own look. Is this possible? If so, is it so without hassle?
Yes it is,
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 04:36:48 -0600
Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 04:13, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
I remember seeing that redhat did some wild integration of KDE and Gnome
in their latest release. I never did get a feel for whether you could
still run KDE with
begin Roger Oberholtzer's quote:
| I have an SuSE 7.1 distro, which I am not using. It was bought for
| testing various distros but is not currently installed anywhere. I
| am looking to try SuSE 8.2. If I buy an upgrade, will it only
| install on an existing 7.1, or will it only ask for a CD to
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:55:09 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
begin Roger Oberholtzer's quote:
| I have an SuSE 7.1 distro, which I am not using. It was bought for
| testing various distros but is not currently installed anywhere. I
| am looking to try SuSE 8.2. If I buy an upgrade, will
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 05:24, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 04:36:48 -0600
Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 04:13, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
I remember seeing that redhat did some wild integration of KDE and Gnome
in their latest release. I never
We are trying to see how far we can go with a distro without changing
things. Updates beyond the original CDs are avoided when possible.
Then the answer is still yes, just look through the various settings
under themes, icons etc.
Great. RH9 arrives tomorrow. Let's see what it does.
On 6/17/2003 8:36 AM, someone claiming to be Myles Green wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 05:24, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 04:36:48 -0600
Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 04:13, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
I remember seeing that redhat did some wild
Kinda off-thread, but there's also the kde-redhat project,
http://kde-redhat.sf.net, which, when combined with apt for rpm,
provides an easy way to keep kde up to date.
The main reason we have tried not to rely on these types of things is that
the systems are in vehicles out on the road. We
Which distros do this? It sounds like pure laziness on their part for not
supplying two kernels.
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:40:22 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering why you're doing this in the first place. Why not just
On 6/17/2003 8:56 AM, someone claiming to be Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
Kinda off-thread, but there's also the kde-redhat project,
http://kde-redhat.sf.net, which, when combined with apt for rpm,
provides an easy way to keep kde up to date.
The main reason we have tried not to rely on these
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
I remember seeing that redhat did some wild integration of KDE and Gnome in
their latest release. I never did get a feel for whether you could still
run KDE with its own look. Is this possible? If so, is it so without hassle?
IIRC, there is an option under KDE to set it
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:08:34 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which distros do this? It sounds like pure laziness on their part for not
supplying two kernels.
One is 'that distro which shall not be named', a.k.a. Caldera COL 3.1x.
--
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 8:07 am, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:55:09 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
begin Roger Oberholtzer's quote:
| I have an SuSE 7.1 distro, which I am not using. It was bought for
| testing various distros but is not currently installed
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:29:04 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:08:34 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which distros do this? It sounds like pure laziness on their part
for not supplying
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Bruce Marshall wrote:
Just a thought but have you looked at Bernard's bootable linux on freshmeat?
freshmeat.net/projects/bblcd/?topic_id=147%2C866
It has all you need to build a bootable CD from your currently running distro.
I did this once on an SuSE distro and it
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:16:46 -0600
bof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
I remember seeing that redhat did some wild integration of KDE and
Gnome intheir latest release. I never did get a feel for whether you
could stillrun KDE with its own look. Is this possible? If so,
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:29:04 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:08:34 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which distros do this? It sounds
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 12:17 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Bruce Marshall wrote:
Just a thought but have you looked at Bernard's bootable linux on
freshmeat?
freshmeat.net/projects/bblcd/?topic_id=147%2C866
It has all you need to build a bootable CD from your currently
June 17, 2003
Linus Torvalds Joins Development Group
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 3:30 p.m. ET
SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) -- The creator of the Linux
operating system is joining a global development group
to focus on further improving the open-source
software.
Linus Torvalds said Tuesday he is
At this point I think I've about run out of ideas as to what could be
causing such an error, as a short while ago I was able to make a
connection using the serial port.
What I'm trying to do is configure a terminal server, and I need to get
access to it through a serial port to configure its
Has anyone had any experience with these folks? How do you get them to
respond?
I purchased the Linux CD version, they send me registration info for
Textmaker fro Windows and Pocket PC's. I email them 6 times in 2 weeks, no
response. Today I get the CD for Textmaker for Windows and Pocket
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 02:20 pm, Harry Giles wrote:
Has anyone had any experience with these folks? How do you get them
to respond?
I purchased the Linux CD version, they send me registration info for
Textmaker fro Windows and Pocket PC's. I email them 6 times in 2
weeks, no response.
begin Harry Giles's quote:
| Has anyone had any experience with these folks? How do you get
| them to respond?
tony's response is accurate. are you sure the linux version isn't on
the cd also? (i have the download version and keep *numerous*
backups, because after using it for six weeks or
Grasping at straws, an stale lock file perhaps?
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
On Tue June 17 2003 06:49 pm, dep wrote:
begin Harry Giles's quote:
| Has anyone had any experience with these folks? How do you get
| them to respond?
tony's response is accurate. are you sure the linux version isn't on
the cd also?
snip
I just checked, just a pdf file, and 2 .exe
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 04:13 PM, Keith Morse wrote:
Grasping at straws, an stale lock file perhaps?
Any idea how I'd go about locating something like that?
David Aikema
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
On 06/17/03 18:54, David Aikema wrote:
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 04:13 PM, Keith Morse wrote:
Grasping at straws, an stale lock file perhaps?
Any idea how I'd go about locating something like that?
/var/lock ??
--
~
L.
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 07:01 PM, Net Llama! wrote:
On 06/17/03 18:54, David Aikema wrote:
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 04:13 PM, Keith Morse wrote:
Grasping at straws, an stale lock file perhaps?
Any idea how I'd go about locating something like that?
/var/lock ??
Thanks. There was a
Quoth David Aikema:
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 04:13 PM, Keith Morse wrote:
Grasping at straws, an stale lock file perhaps?
Any idea how I'd go about locating something like that?
/var/run or /var/lock?
K
--
It was a virgin forest, a place where the Hand of Man had never set
foot.
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 07:38 PM, Kurt Wall wrote:
Quoth David Aikema:
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 04:13 PM, Keith Morse wrote:
Grasping at straws, an stale lock file perhaps?
Any idea how I'd go about locating something like that?
/var/run or /var/lock?
There's nothing that seems
On 06/17/03 20:03, David Aikema wrote:
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 07:38 PM, Kurt Wall wrote:
Quoth David Aikema:
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 04:13 PM, Keith Morse wrote:
Grasping at straws, an stale lock file perhaps?
Any idea how I'd go about locating something like that?
/var/run
36 matches
Mail list logo
