quoth Tony Alfrey:
| Q. What do you call three lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?
dead moe, dead larry, and dead curly.
actually, i made up a joke yesterday:
in the civilized world, mothers tell their children always to wear
clean underwear because they might get into an accident. in
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 19:20:22 -0600
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I'll have to give tknotepad a try. I've been using beaver recently,
and it's aok. Ah shucks, no ebuild yet for tknotepad!
Nothing to build. Pick up the tcl/Tk script, make sure you have
tcl/Tck, and run it.
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:03:54 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:58:27 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:06:17 -0500
ronnie gauthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 14:37:01 -0400 - Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
On 7/2/2003 1:50 PM, someone claiming to be ronnie gauthier wrote:
snip-a-roo
I believe Vern has a point
Quoth Collins Richey:
[...]
Long live tolerance!
Intolerant people should shot, hung, drawn, and quartered. ;-)
Kurt
--
Magnocartic, adj.:
Any automobile that, when left unattended, attracts shopping
carts.
-- Sniglets, Rich Hall Friends
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 21:48:27 -0400
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoth Collins Richey:
[...]
Long live tolerance!
Intolerant people should shot, hung, drawn, and quartered. ;-)
That's what was missing in this interchange - blood and gore and guts!
At least Hitler isn't the
is as common as notes in a third
grade class. Most of us wouldnt have it any other way.
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:23:49 -0700 - Vern W Heesch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
Am I the only one that finds a whole bunch of these non-linux
related emails inmy inbox
spell it out for you.
Off topic and other such stuff is as common as notes in a third
grade class. Most of us wouldnt have it any other way.
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:23:49 -0700 - Vern W Heesch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
Am I the only one
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 22:44:27 -0400
Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard that even mentioning gentoo is enough to bring on
protests Is that true???
g,d,r
Absolutely! It's always worked for me (several meanings here).
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 22:44:27 -0400 - Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the
following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
On Thursday 03 July 2003 22:42 pm, Collins Richey wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 16:32:14 -0700
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who died and voted you list bully?
On 07/01/03 16:21
No thanks, i don't like your beer.
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, ronnie gauthier wrote:
Nobody, Just thought I'd share a beer, want one?
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 16:32:14
-0700
-
Net
Llama!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
Who died and voted you list bully?
On 07/01/03
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 00:01:53 -0500
ronnie gauthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 19:36:23 -0700 - Vern W Heesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
Fine, I have my beer, I read what you had to say.
If most of us wouldn't have it any other way, why
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 09:49:37 -0700 - Vern W Heesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 00:01:53 -0500
ronnie gauthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 19:36:23 -0700 - Vern W Heesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 09:49 am, Vern W Heesch wrote:
snip
Ah, I see, my mistake. I thought the purpose of this list was to help
with linux related questions. I totally missed that it was here for
your amusement. And no, I am not willing to spend my time loading an
app and deleting the
On 7/2/2003 1:50 PM, someone claiming to be ronnie gauthier wrote:
snip-a-roo
I believe Vern has a point here. This thread started OT, had *nothing*
remotely to do with linux, and should've been started on general. That's
Tom Condon's fault. Dunno if he's sub'd to general or not, but his
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Tony Alfrey wrote:
By the way, did anybody find Skippy? Does not sound good.
As far as I know, no one has been able to contact him.
--
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
On 7/2/2003 1:50 PM, someone claiming to be ronnie gauthier wrote:
snip-a-roo
I believe Vern has a point here. This thread started OT, had *nothing*
remotely to do with linux, and should've been started on general. That's
Tom Condon's fault. Dunno if
On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 14:37:01 -0400 - Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the
following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
On 7/2/2003 1:50 PM, someone claiming to be ronnie gauthier wrote:
snip-a-roo
I believe Vern has a point here. This thread started OT, had *nothing*
remotely to do with linux, and should've
quoth Tom Condon:
there's one more: if a guy gets all liquored up and runs his car into
someone, it's an alcohol-related incident, but if he gets all
liquored up and shoots someone, it's a gun-related incident.
--
dep
http://www.linuxandmain.com -- outside the box, barely within
the envelope,
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 06:51:04 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quoth Tom Condon:
there's one more: if a guy gets all liquored up and runs his car into
someone, it's an alcohol-related incident, but if he gets all
liquored up and shoots someone, it's a gun-related incident.
Let's not
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 06:19:24AM -0500, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 06:51:04 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quoth Tom Condon:
there's one more: if a guy gets all liquored up and runs his car into
someone, it's an alcohol-related incident, but if he gets all
liquored up
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is superior to all others.
--
~~
Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is superior to all others.
==
`cept
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is superior to
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:58:27 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 13:54, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 11:11 am, Tom Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 13:54, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Aaron Grewell wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 11:11 am, Tom Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 13:54, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Aha! Desktop wars! My desktop is the best ever... as long as you've got
512MB RAM!
KWrite Rulez! :)
yea, but its embedded in that virus called KDE.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Aaron Grewell wrote:
Aha! Desktop wars! My desktop is the best ever... as long as you've got
512MB RAM!
KWrite Rulez! :)
yea, but its embedded in that virus called KDE.
I've got 1GB, and i still run XFCE. I'd rather use my hardware for
something other than
On 7/1/2003 3:18 PM, someone claiming to be Aaron Grewell wrote:
Aha! Desktop wars! My desktop is the best ever... as long as you've got
512MB RAM!
KWrite Rulez! :)
yea, but its embedded in that virus called KDE.
Top posting sux! Bottom post, or reply in line ;-)
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
On 7/1/2003 3:18 PM, someone claiming to be Aaron Grewell wrote:
Aha! Desktop wars! My desktop is the best ever... as long as you've got
512MB RAM!
KWrite Rulez! :)
yea, but its embedded in that virus called KDE.
Top posting sux! Bottom
I think having to scroll down through 500 lines of crap to find a one line
answer sucks.
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:43:35 -0400 - Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the
following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
On 7/1/2003 3:18 PM, someone claiming to be Aaron Grewell wrote:
Aha! Desktop wars! My desktop
quoth ronnie gauthier:
| I think having to scroll down through 500 lines of crap to find a
| one line answer sucks.
and i think that inasmuch as one cannot subscribe to every-other
message or every-10th message or merely the occasional random
message, that absent any poetic purpose in having
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 4:07 pm, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
On 7/1/2003 3:18 PM, someone claiming to be Aaron Grewell wrote:
Aha! Desktop wars! My desktop is the best ever... as long as you've
got 512MB RAM!
KWrite Rulez! :)
It depends. If I'm doing stuff where I need the whole context (helping with
technical problems or whatever) then top replying and leaving the whole thing
can be the best thing. For other stuff, not so much. So I randomize,
inevitably picking whatever will get the most tomatoes thrown my way
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 02:07 pm, Aaron Grewell wrote:
snip
that having been said, top replying does suck -- it smacks of the
overbearing fourth-grade teacher. or a lawyer or something.
snip
I believe that this thread could easily take over the entire world, now
that we've included
Tony Alfrey wrote:
I believe that this thread could easily take over the entire world,
now that we've included 'lawyers' in the subject. I think it's time
for a thread OTLawyer Jokes.
Q. What do you call three lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?
Half a deep six?
In Harmony's Way, and In A
Quoth Net Llama!:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is superior to all others.
Except vi. ;-)
Kurt
--
Scott's first Law:
No matter what goes wrong, it will probably look right.
Quoth Tom Wilson:
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 13:54, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there,
Quoth dep:
quoth ronnie gauthier:
| I think having to scroll down through 500 lines of crap to find a
| one line answer sucks.
and i think that inasmuch as one cannot subscribe to every-other
message or every-10th message or merely the occasional random
message, that absent any poetic
Quoth Tony Alfrey:
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 02:07 pm, Aaron Grewell wrote:
snip
that having been said, top replying does suck -- it smacks of the
overbearing fourth-grade teacher. or a lawyer or something.
snip
I believe that this thread could easily take over the entire world, now
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 06:13 pm, Kurt Wall's voice rose above the ones
in my head and stated:
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is superior to all others.
==
`cept *Nedit* ;o)
It's all about Joe.
I had several cups of Joe before I left for
Am I the only one that finds a whole bunch of these non-linux related emails in my
inbox annoying?
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:57:56 -0700
Condon Thomas A KPWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
I believe that this thread could easily take over the entire world,
now that we've
n 07/01/03 15:58, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 03:23:49PM -0700, Vern W Heesch wrote:
Am I the only one that finds a whole bunch of these non-linux related
emails in my inbox annoying?
The subject says OT (Off Topic) for a reason.
So does the general list.
--
the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
Am I the only one that finds a whole bunch of these non-linux related emails in
my inbox annoying?
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:57:56 -0700
Condon Thomas A KPWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
I believe that this thread could easily take over the entire
.
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:23:49 -0700 - Vern W Heesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
Am I the only one that finds a whole bunch of these non-linux related emails in
my inbox annoying?
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:57:56 -0700
Condon Thomas A KPWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Alfrey
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 03:16 pm, Kurt Wall wrote:
Quoth Tony Alfrey:
snip
Q. What do you call three lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?
A start.
Bingo. Actually, the way I've heard it is A good start.
- . -
--
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd Rather Be Sailing
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:23:55 -0700
Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 02:07 pm, Aaron Grewell wrote:
snip
that having been said, top replying does suck -- it smacks of the
overbearing fourth-grade teacher. or a lawyer or something.
snip
I believe that
Quoth Michael Scottaline:
Wait a minute.., isn't a thread considered dead once someone brings up
lawyers???
Oh, no..., wait, that's Nazis or Hitler. Sigh I guess all the bottom
feeders could be lumped together, huh? chuckle...
Moreover, you can't deliberately mention Hitler just to kill
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 06:01 pm, Michael Scottaline wrote:
snip
Sigh I guess all the
bottom feeders could be lumped together, huh? chuckle...
ROTFLOL Bottom feeders ! ! ! !
Gives the poor fish a bad name.
--
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd Rather Be Sailing
, 1 Jul 2003 15:23:49 -0700 - Vern W Heesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
Am I the only one that finds a whole bunch of these non-linux related emails in
my inbox annoying?
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 14:57:56 -0700
Condon Thomas A KPWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
and other such stuff is as common as notes in a third grade class.
Most of us wouldnt have it any other way.
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:23:49 -0700 - Vern W Heesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
Am I the only one that finds a whole bunch of these non-linux related emails in
my
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 10:39, Net Llama! wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
Could we do editor wars again then (emacs sucks :-).
No war there, emacs does suck. Pico is superior to all others.
pft... nano rawx ;)
--
Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 12:03, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:58:27 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Michael Scottaline wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled furiously:
On Tue, 1 Jul
Nobody, Just thought I'd share a beer, want one?
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 16:32:14
-0700
-
Net
Llama!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
Who died and voted you list bully?
On 07/01/03 16:21, ronnie gauthier wrote:
Vern, I can call you Vern, Can't I? Good. Vern, listen. Grab
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 19:36:23 -0700 - Vern W Heesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the following
Re: Re: Blame [OT]
Fine, I have my beer, I read what you had to say.
If most of us wouldn't have it any other way, why was the General list
created? I still remember because I was a member of this list when
57 matches
Mail list logo
