Yes, he is. Always.
-jhb-
-Original Message-
From: Collins Richey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: test message
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:08:14 -0400 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quoth Kurt Wall:
| Quoth Keith Morse
Quoth Collins Richey:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:08:14 -0400 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quoth Kurt Wall:
| Quoth Keith Morse:
| Please ignore.
|
| Pardon me? Did you say something? No? I didn't think so.
hey. cut him a break. he's probably married.
--
dep
Writing takes
Quoth dep:
quoth Kurt Wall:
| Quoth Keith Morse:
| Please ignore.
|
| Pardon me? Did you say something? No? I didn't think so.
hey. cut him a break. he's probably married.
That explains it! ;-)
Kurt
--
panic: kernel trap (ignored)
___
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 17:35, Keith Morse wrote:
Please ignore.
Speak louder, I'm ignoring you.
--
burns
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Quoth Keith Morse:
Please ignore.
Pardon me? Did you say something? No? I didn't think so.
K
--
Virtual means never knowing where your next byte is coming from.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
quoth Kurt Wall:
| Quoth Keith Morse:
| Please ignore.
|
| Pardon me? Did you say something? No? I didn't think so.
hey. cut him a break. he's probably married.
--
dep
Writing takes no time. It's finding something to say that takes forever.
___
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:08:14 -0400 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quoth Kurt Wall:
| Quoth Keith Morse:
| Please ignore.
|
| Pardon me? Did you say something? No? I didn't think so.
hey. cut him a break. he's probably married.
--
dep
Writing takes no time. It's finding something to
Quoth ronnie gauthier:
test 10/19
Damn, and I forgot to study!
Kurt
--
Every absurdity has a champion who will defend it.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
0.526315789
On Sunday 19 October 2003 10:24 pm, someone claiming to be ronnie gauthier
wrote:
test 10/19
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
--
RedHat
ronnie gauthier wrote:
anyone home?
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Just got home but I was at work about 15 mins ago. But glad to be home now.
But did
Home office... That count?
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 18:32:11 -0500
ronnie gauthier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyone home?
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Quoth ronnie gauthier:
anyone home?
No. I'm at work.
Kurt
--
It is the business of little minds to shrink.
-- Carl Sandburg
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
burns wrote:
OK, when?
LOL sheesh... I think I'll write a bogus request for help next time
something like.
Guys,
I'm tired of Linux and I realize that microsoft has been badly maligned
and really should be given a second chance.
How do I transfer my data away from Linux accross to my
On 10/3/2003 9:22 AM, I believe that James McDonald wrote:
burns wrote:
OK, when?
LOL sheesh... I think I'll write a bogus request for help next time
something like.
Guys,
I'm tired of Linux and I realize that microsoft has been badly maligned
and really should be given a second
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:22:33 +1000
James McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
burns wrote:
OK, when?
LOL sheesh... I think I'll write a bogus request for help next time
something like.
Guys,
I'm tired of Linux and I realize that microsoft has been badly maligned
and
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 09:30:59 -0400
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/3/2003 9:22 AM, I believe that James McDonald wrote:
burns wrote:
OK, when?
LOL sheesh... I think I'll write a bogus request for help next time
something like.
Guys,
I'm tired of
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 07:37:54 -0600
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course. A bare TEST message (with or without [please] ignore) simply means
reply with wiseass remarks!
OK, so when do we get some?
Terence
___
Linux-users mailing list
Of course. A bare TEST message (with or without [please] ignore)
simply means reply with wiseass remarks!
OK, so when do we get some?
Terence
That is between you and your SO.
In Harmony's Way and In A Chord,
Tom ;-})
Registered Linux User #154358
Plain Text Emails Don't
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 17:02:59 +0100
Terence McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 07:37:54 -0600
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course. A bare TEST message (with or without [please] ignore) simply
means reply with wiseass remarks!
OK, so when do we get some?
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:13:40 -0600
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check the archives.
Awwh- and I thought I might get something new..
Terence
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
-Original Message-
From: James McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 5:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TEST
___
Grade: F -- No name on test.
___
OK, when?
--
burns
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Quoth ronnie gauthier:
test 1
echo $?
0
Kurt
--
One difference between a man and a machine is that a machine is quiet
when well oiled.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
On 09/07/03 09:00, Marianne Taylor wrote:
I have been trying to send messages to the list for two days. Trying
another mail program?
Heard you loud clear.
--
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 09:00:19 -0700, Marianne Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have been trying to send messages to the list for two days. Trying
another mail program?
You're coming in loud and clear ;o)
--
Myles Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slackware-9.1pre + IceWM-1.2.12 + Sylpheed-0.9.4
--
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 12:00, Marianne Taylor wrote:
I have been trying to send messages to the list for two days. Trying
another mail program?
A-OK
--
burns
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
On 31 Aug 2003 19:44:24 -0400 burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] professed:
Test, over
--
burns
Your are 559 OM
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:44 am, burns wrote:
Test, over
Hell, I did not even know it had begun! Waht was I tested for?
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161
Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 21:41, Keith Antoine wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:44 am, burns wrote:
Test, over
Hell, I did not even know it had begun! Waht was I tested for?
sexually transmitted diseases. You failed and now will have to study
much harder for the re-test.
--
burns
Quoth burns:
Test, over
Ayup.
--
All my life I wanted to be someone; I guess I should have been more
specific.
-- Jane Wagner
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
Quoth Keith Antoine:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:44 am, burns wrote:
Test, over
Hell, I did not even know it had begun! Waht was I tested for?
If we have to tell you, you failed. :-)
Kurt
--
Pity the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.
-- Don Marquis
harder for the re-test.
Thats no bloody good, I lost the instruction sheet.
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061, Australia:: PH:61733002161
Practising Geriatric, Retired Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 18:31:00 +1000
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats no bloody good, I lost the instruction sheet.
so what about the hand book?
Terence
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
Quoth Terence McCarthy:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 18:31:00 +1000
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats no bloody good, I lost the instruction sheet.
so what about the hand book?
Woot!
Kurt
--
Excellent day for putting Slinkies on an escalator.
failed and now will have to study
much harder for the re-test.
Thats no bloody good, I lost the instruction sheet.
Put tab A in slot B, Repeat.
Bill
--
INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 21:17, burns carved in granite:
radio check, over
There are no checks in radio buttons, only in check boxes.
In Harmony's Way and In A Chord,
Tom ;-})
Tom. Condon
Barbershop Bass Singer
Registered Linux User #154358
A Jester Unemployed
On 27 Aug 2003 00:17:17 -0400
burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
radio check, over
OK, over
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Quoth burns:
radio check, over
Under. In. Through. Beside.
K
--
You will lose your present job and have to become a door to door
mayonnaise salesman.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
radio check, over
--
burns
QSL OM, I read you 5 by 5
Shawn
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
10-4 buddy. I gotcha loud-n-cleer!
burns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/27/2003 12:17 AM
Please respond to general
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Test
radio check, over
--
Turned off PARIDE and it got further. I'm now playing with other options
trying to get a good build. Will post back if I come across one I can't get
around.
Thanks for listening...
Tim
On Thursday 21 August 2003 10:11 am, someone claiming to be Tim Wunder wrote:
Decided to take a stab at
WooHoo! Success! (well, almost)
I've booted to the new test kernel. Can't really notice a difference, yet,
'cept for sound not working :-(. It doesn't look like the sound module got
loaded. Oh well, I'm getting there
Took me only 9 iterations of make gconfig ;-)
If anybody knows how to get
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 19:10, Wade Barocsi wrote:
test.- sorry
wade
Thats OK, at least I know the list my ISP are still up.
Been way quiet today.
Tom
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
hehe.. at least use a [ot] tag.
Mr. Richey is definitely not a new comer here. :)
Having trouble getting mail to the list.
As a general rule it's better to send to the list owner rather than to the
list to test blocks and other connectivity problems. In this case messages
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 12:16:11PM -0600, Collins Richey wrote:
Having trouble getting mail to the list.
As a general rule it's better to send to the list owner rather than to the
list to test blocks and other connectivity problems. In this case messages
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 03:21:14AM -0500, Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
test test test, am I getting thru
Nope, yer not gettin' through.
Kurt
--
The Pig, if I am not mistaken,
Gives us ham and pork and Bacon.
Let others think his heart is big,
I think it stupid of the Pig.
--
On Saturday 19 October 2002 06:21 pm, Richard R. Sivernell espoused with
vigour:
test test test, am I getting thru
cheers
No you only got to me, must be in a tunnel.
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric,
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002 08:05:45 +1000
Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 19 October 2002 06:21 pm, Richard R. Sivernell espoused with
vigour:
test test test, am I getting thru
cheers
No you only got to me, must be in a tunnel.
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 12:38, Tim Wunder wrote:
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 05:11 am, Keith Antoine wrote:
Whats this I have received at least 2 emails one from Tim Wunder and now
you, where all the messages etc are attachments no text at all.
Using KMail:
View-Inlined Attachments should
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:09, Bill Day wrote:
or if its winders you wont be able to read them at all 8-)
suggestion, for windows the mozilla 1.0 release is fairly stable... jsut
dont let M$ fight over who is default set miozilla as the default and
leave it at that...
Bill Day
No never
If you use kmail then it's a pretty yellow banner for an untrusted key and a
pretty green banner for a trusted key and a really ugly red banner for
microsoft security bulletins because they changed there key or something.
(Doug Hunley I lost your pub key when I used Windows XP to delete a ext3
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 03:30, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Whats this I have received at least 2 emails one from Tim Wunder and now you,
where all the messages etc are attachments no text at all.
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 05:11 am, Keith Antoine wrote:
Whats this I have received at least 2 emails one from Tim Wunder and now
you, where all the messages etc are attachments no text at all.
Using KMail:
View-Inlined Attachments should clear that up.
HTH,
Tim
--
Caldera
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Antoine spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 03:30, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Whats this I have received at least 2 emails one from Tim Wunder and now
you, where all the messages etc are attachments no text at
users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
- Original Message -
From: Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: test 2 sign
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 05:11 am, Keith Antoine wrote:
Whats this I have received at least 2 emails
It worked your message was read by an old man doing nothing but wasting time
reading other peoples mail. :)
- Original Message -
From: Ronnie Gauthier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:47 AM
Subject: test
damn.
I think chartermi.net is bouncing all
On Friday 14 June 2002 03:47 pm, Ronnie Gauthier enshrined in prose:
damn.
I think chartermi.net is bouncing all outside mail
power went out for a bit and cable tv was down for about 5 hours. internet
stayed up throughout but I have not gotten any outside mail
so i guess sending this is an
Richard R. Sivernell spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
That will be hard to dog
especially with those opinions of his :)
- --
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Nor would this be a good habit to cultivate!
In Harmony's Way, and In A Chord,
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 18:35:25 -0700
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
That will be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard R. Sivernell spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
That will be hard to dog
especially with those opinions of his :)
- --
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: Linux StepByStep -
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 22:38:47 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this thing turned on?
Depends on what was in the Kool-Aid.
--
++===+
| Roger Oberholtzer | E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| OPQ Systems AB |
Mail received.
Tom
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
Received:from linux-sxs.org (linux.nf [204.210.228.123]) by
mail.linux-works.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id
JAA09149 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:19:34
-0600
Received:from linux-sxs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by linux-sxs.org
(8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id
g3UEwK0I003693; Tue, 30
Scribbling feverishly on April 30, Andrew Mathews managed to emit:
Received:from linux-sxs.org (linux.nf [204.210.228.123]) by
mail.linux-works.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id
JAA09149 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:19:34
-0600
Received:from linux-sxs.org (localhost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kurt Wall spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
You guessed right. I sent it last night from linux-sxs.org...
seems that mimedefang went 'run-away' last night and the OOM killer waxed it.
unfortunately, the parent process wasn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Net Llama! spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
How often does this occur?
which part? first time I've had it happen to me. the mimedefang list has had
this come up from time to time. the OOM thing seems to a hot-button on lkml
from
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Net Llama! spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
How often does this occur?
which part? first time I've had it happen to me. the mimedefang list has had
this come up from time to time. the OOM thing
Typing furiously on February 20, Ken Moffat managed to emit:
sorry
Is that an apology or a self-description? ;-)
K
--
You attempt things that you do not even plan because of your extreme stupidity.
___
Linux-users mailing list -
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:22:16 -0500
Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled in frustration:
can anyone hear me? Glenn? Ian? Anyone?
Comin' through here!!
Mike
--
He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot but don't let that
fool you., he really is an idiot.
69 matches
Mail list logo
