*** Gerry,
I mailed an excuse at 01:46 AM and you flamed me at 02:06... Why? :-(((
Cool down, I am already in deep sh** without you kicking on top of it...
Zoran.
snip
What is true about this?br x-sigsepp/x-sigsep Cheers,br
Zoran.br /html
Do you really feel it is necessary to post
At 09:05 10/04/2002 -0700, you wrote:
There is often a utility partition for things like GUI RAID management on
NetServers. It is not strictly necessary, especially if you know how to
configure your RAID controller with the built-in interface on the
controller.
You should have no problem
I am fighting with an OS and a mail prog I do not understand, I do not want
to understand, and I wish my boss would stop forcing this shit on me.
Anyway, some old mails got sent again... Sorry!
Zoran.
___
Linux-users mailing list -
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Zoki wrote:
html
*** I will be installing RH 7.x on this machine without knowing what to think of the
following: According to several colleagues HP seems to use the MBR for keeping
hardware quot;specific dataquot; (?) in there which accordingly does not allow to
write
I would be amazed if that's the case. Win98 and WinMe flushed the MBR on
every install if I remmebered correctly.
Zoki wrote:
*** I will be installing RH 7.x on this machine without knowing what to
think of the following: According to several colleagues HP seems to use
the MBR for keeping
There is often a utility partition for things like GUI RAID management on
NetServers. It is not strictly necessary, especially if you know how to
configure your RAID controller with the built-in interface on the controller.
You should have no problem writing to the MBR. I have done this on
