Re: ksh93 on Caldera

2003-07-02 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 07:43:38 -0600 bof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I never had any luck with compiling the ATT version, so I used the binary that comes with Slackware. It runs just fine under Red Hat 7.3, and AFAIK is completely standards compliant with the KSH93 specs. Have you considered

ksh93 on Caldera

2003-07-01 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
I need to run ksh93 on Caldera 3.1.1. The pdksh that comes with 3.1.1 lacks features used in some test scripts that we want to run on Linux. I downloaded the compiled ksh93 for Linux from ATT, only to see that it uses glibc 2.3, which I do not have installed. My question is, would I be able

Re: ksh93 on Caldera

2003-07-01 Thread bof
Roger Oberholtzer wrote: I need to run ksh93 on Caldera 3.1.1. The pdksh that comes with 3.1.1 lacks features used in some test scripts that we want to run on Linux. I downloaded the compiled ksh93 for Linux from ATT, only to see that it uses glibc 2.3, which I do not have installed. My question

Re: ksh93 on Caldera

2003-07-01 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:27:36 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: I need to run ksh93 on Caldera 3.1.1. The pdksh that comes with 3.1.1 lacks features used in some test scripts that we want to run on Linux. I downloaded the compiled

Re: ksh93 on Caldera

2003-07-01 Thread Net Llama!
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: Upgrading glibc to 2.3 shouldn't be hard. I've done it several times withou any problems. Going to 3.x is another story altogether. If you plan to maintain this box for a long time, you'll be saving youself a ton of grief by upgrading glibc.