On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 07:43:38 -0600
bof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never had any luck with compiling the ATT version, so I used the
binary that comes with Slackware. It runs just fine under Red Hat 7.3,
and AFAIK is completely standards compliant with the KSH93 specs.
Have you considered
I need to run ksh93 on Caldera 3.1.1. The pdksh that comes with 3.1.1 lacks
features used in some test scripts that we want to run on Linux.
I downloaded the compiled ksh93 for Linux from ATT, only to see that it
uses glibc 2.3, which I do not have installed.
My question is, would I be able
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
I need to run ksh93 on Caldera 3.1.1. The pdksh that comes with 3.1.1 lacks
features used in some test scripts that we want to run on Linux.
I downloaded the compiled ksh93 for Linux from ATT, only to see that it
uses glibc 2.3, which I do not have installed.
My question
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:27:36 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
I need to run ksh93 on Caldera 3.1.1. The pdksh that comes with 3.1.1
lacks features used in some test scripts that we want to run on Linux.
I downloaded the compiled
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
Upgrading glibc to 2.3 shouldn't be hard. I've done it several times
withou any problems. Going to 3.x is another story altogether. If you
plan to maintain this box for a long time, you'll be saving youself a ton
of grief by upgrading glibc.