compilation of gcc will produce a libstdc++. how does it differ from the
standalone ilbstdc++ package?
also, I couldnt' compile my own libstdc++. there is no install.sh in the
tar-ball.
Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
Why would you think that?
it is stl code for c++, is it not. If so you
would
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:55:54 +0800
m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
compilation of gcc will produce a libstdc++. how does it differ from the
standalone ilbstdc++ package?
also, I couldnt' compile my own libstdc++. there is no install.sh in the
tar-ball.
Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
I took a careful look nito libstdc++'s documentation. This libstdc++
should be added into gcc source tree.. I need to rebuild my gcc
I stiill think caldera deliberately compile mysql against the libstdc++
package and created an un-necessary dependency.
* quote from
seems that linuxfromscratch didn't use libstdc++ at all but the one
craeted by gcc-2.95.3. am I correct?
so caldera COL 3.1 possibly doens't need it at all ?_?
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/ v \
news://news.hkpcug.org
