On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 12:36 pm, Ted Ozolins wrote:
Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an
rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the
package, so I tried for about the third time, but in command mode I
rpm -ihv
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an
rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the
package, so I tried for about the third time, but in command
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 15:34, Gerry Doris wrote:
Actually, I use MailScanner and have installed both F-Prot and ClamAV.
F-Prot is free for non-commercial users. MailScanner installs seamlessly
requiring no changes to sendmail (also works with Postfix and Exim).
MailScanner calls the
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 05:04, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
It could be worse... No offense to any Germans, but this could have been the German
legal system... IIRC, the German government presses the charges without any
plaintiff needing to be involved... I'm referring to the KOffice
BBC's Click OnLine did an informal test of how e-mail addresses get
listed for receiving spam. They found that the most effective way was
when the address occurred in a web page. They concluded that the address
harvesters seemed to crawl the web looking for addresses. Just sending
e-mail was not
On 3 Aug 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 15:34, Gerry Doris wrote:
Actually, I use MailScanner and have installed both F-Prot and ClamAV.
F-Prot is free for non-commercial users. MailScanner installs seamlessly
requiring no changes to sendmail (also works with
Gerry Doris wrote:
since ClamAV is the only open source application that I'm aware of.
What about these?
http://www.openantivirus.org/
http://www.amavis.org/
Michael
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
On 08/03/03 01:34, Keith Antoine wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an
rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet I did install the
package, so I tried for
On Sunday 03 August 2003 4:34 am, someone claiming to be Keith Antoine wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do an
rpm -q gtk+, only to get told its not installed. Yet
FYI,
2.6.0-test2 is 100% stable on my desktop system (ext3). I use sylpheed,
MozillaFirebird 0.61 with plugins including mplayer, OpenOffice, CUPS,
xterms (aterm), and nvidia kernel and glx support.
A few notes:
1) The default kernel config now omits PC speaker support. It's
buried pretty
On 08/03/03 08:21, Collins Richey wrote:
4) Most users of the new built-in alsa support report success, but I
can't get the alsa-ens1371 drivers to work for my SB 16 PCI card. Works
fine using the deprecated OSS driver.
I've got one of these too, so i'm interested to hear the progress you make.
On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 08:18:38 -0700
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08/03/03 08:21, Collins Richey wrote:
4) Most users of the new built-in alsa support report success, but I
can't get the alsa-ens1371 drivers to work for my SB 16 PCI card.
Works fine using the deprecated OSS
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:21:16 -0600
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI,
2.6.0-test2 is 100% stable on my desktop system (ext3).
Another report:
Tried 2.6.0 beta 2 but couldn't get em8300-libraries or em8300-modules
to happen at all. A total no-go. Went back to 2.4.21 because
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 02:57, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
BBC's Click OnLine did an informal test of how e-mail addresses get
listed for receiving spam. They found that the most effective way was
when the address occurred in a web page.
snip
My e-mail address in a web page is:
script
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 12:51 am, Net Llama! wrote:
OK, so apparently mandrake named it 'gtk+2.0'. You still need to install
gtk+2.0-devel
Thats the real problem in that I am unable to find gtk+2.0-devel anywhere
online. Not in rpmfind or mandrake lists.
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'SKIPPY'
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 12:54 am, Tim Wunder wrote:
On Sunday 03 August 2003 4:34 am, someone claiming to be Keith Antoine
wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 09:11 am, Net Llama! wrote:
On 08/02/03 15:58, Keith Antoine wrote:
At the risk of being boring and getting back to kernel compile: I do
an
All the machines I SSH into remotely seem to log me out rather quickly
(2 minutes?) if I'm not doing anything. I presume it's an inactivity
timer. Is there some way to bump this time up a bit (like an option in
sshd_config)? I can't find one.
Thanks,
Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Antoine wrote:
| On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 12:51 am, Net Llama! wrote:
|
|
|OK, so apparently mandrake named it 'gtk+2.0'. You still need to install
|gtk+2.0-devel
|
|
| Thats the real problem in that I am unable to find gtk+2.0-devel anywhere
|
Just starting to experiment with samba to reach files that are on my
wife's WinXP machine accross the room. Works OK for file access using
the sample smb.conf file provided by gentoo (only modified to add my
workgroup), except for the nitpick described below.
When I mount a directory with
Collins Richey wrote:
Is there any way to cause the mount not to prompt for a passwd? Hint, I
have no defined users and do not log in to the WinXP box.
Flames anticipated, security, etc., etc., but this is only on my
internal net behind the router.
If you put the appropriate line in /etc/fstab
On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 20:16:18 -0500
Michael Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Collins Richey wrote:
Is there any way to cause the mount not to prompt for a passwd?
Hint, I have no defined users and do not log in to the WinXP box.
Flames anticipated, security, etc., etc., but this is only
21 matches
Mail list logo
