On Fri, Sep 26, 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
...
I'll be using it for high-end 3D visualization, high throughput data
processing (filtering many Gbytes) and at night our developers will run
their builds on it. Should be fun...
The system I want to see is a bunch of Apple G5s doing distributed
Well, problem solved. Turns out things were NOT authenticating correctly
on normal logins, hence ipop3d couldn't either. It fooled me because
everything I was doing used ssh keys to get in.
Anyway, it does not work to copy the user entries from /etc/passwd,
/etc/shadow, /etc/group,
Michael Hipp wrote:
I just did a clean install of RH9 on a server that was running RH8,
everything is working great except that ipop3d won't authenticate any
users. Just says Bad authentication. This was working fine on RH8
and I don't remember putting any real effort into getting it working.
Alan Jackson wrote:
Well I got a Linux box at work last week. On my desk. This is significant,
because we are looking to replace all Unix desktops with Linux over the
next couple of years (about 5000 systems).
I'm the local guinea pig.
It's a pretty good box. It's an HP with dual 3 Ghz Xeons,
Well I got a Linux box at work last week. On my desk. This is significant,
because we are looking to replace all Unix desktops with Linux over the
next couple of years (about 5000 systems).
I'm the local guinea pig.
It's a pretty good box. It's an HP with dual 3 Ghz Xeons, 4 Gb ram, and
an
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 20:49, Bill Campbell wrote:
FWIW, tcpflow is a program that's very useful for debugging things like
this. It is very similar to tcpdump except that it creates files for each
connection (e.g. one for the connection from the pop/imap client to the
server, and another for
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003, Kurt Wall wrote:
Oh, this is just *too* ridiculous. I log my spam rejections and keep a
graph of rejected connection attempts to my SMTP server. Thanks to
Swen, on 24 September, Postfix rejected 4628 attempts just from hosts
lacking hostnames that resolve to known IP address.
Quoth burns:
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 20:49, Bill Campbell wrote:
FWIW, tcpflow is a program that's very useful for debugging things like
this. It is very similar to tcpdump except that it creates files for each
connection (e.g. one for the connection from the pop/imap client to the
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
Well, problem solved. Turns out things were NOT authenticating correctly
on normal logins, hence ipop3d couldn't either. It fooled me because
everything I was doing used ssh keys to get in.
I'm glad you figured it out.
FWIW, tcpflow is a program that's
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003, burns wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 20:49, Bill Campbell wrote:
FWIW, tcpflow is a program that's very useful for debugging things like
this. It is very similar to tcpdump except that it creates files for each
connection (e.g. one for the connection from the pop/imap
Quoth Bill Campbell:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003, Kurt Wall wrote:
Oh, this is just *too* ridiculous. I log my spam rejections and keep a
graph of rejected connection attempts to my SMTP server. Thanks to
Swen, on 24 September, Postfix rejected 4628 attempts just from hosts
lacking hostnames that
I was trying to install Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60 from tarball.
Perl Makefile.PL
make
checkinstall
I ran into this error:
Installing RPM package... FAILED!
*** Failed to install the package
Do you want to see the log file? [y]:
error: cannot open file
Original Message
Subject: samba-3.0.0
Date: 26 Sep 2003 21:33:09 +0800
From: toylet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Hong Kong PC User Group http://www.hkpcug.org
Newsgroups: hkpcug.linux
anyone successfully compiled it from source?
I hit an error:
Linking bin/smbd
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 13:17:41 +0800, M.W. Chang wrote:
I was trying to install Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60 from tarball.
Perl Makefile.PL
make
checkinstall
I ran into this error:
Installing RPM package... FAILED!
*** Failed to install the package
Do you want to see the log file? [y]:
error:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
Well, problem solved. Turns out things were NOT authenticating correctly
on normal logins, hence ipop3d couldn't either. It fooled me because
everything I was doing used ssh keys to get in.
I must have glossed over that part of your mail. I thought
I don't have the error with other packages. that's really strange
Federico Voges wrote:
error: cannot open file
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-1.i386.
rpm: No such file or directory
why would there be a redhat word when I am using caldera OpenLinux system?
Nope, it's just
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 21:19, Kurt Wall wrote:
http://www.circlemud.org/~jelson/software/tcpflow/
domo aregato, kurt-san (or something like that)
--
burns
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 13:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Brad De Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a network of WinXX PC's with a single Linux box
acting as the gateway/firewall/dhcp server/e-mail
server/etc. My Linux box connects to the ISP via 128K
ISDN dial-up line (too far away for DSL and cable is
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
Alan Jackson wrote:
Well I got a Linux box at work last week. On my desk. This is significant,
because we are looking to replace all Unix desktops with Linux over the
next couple of years (about 5000 systems).
I'm the local guinea pig.
It's
Quoth burns:
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 21:19, Kurt Wall wrote:
http://www.circlemud.org/~jelson/software/tcpflow/
domo aregato, kurt-san (or something like that)
You're welcome, I think, Burns-san.
Kurt
--
Certainly there are things in life that money can't buy, but it's very funny--
Keith Morse wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Michael Hipp wrote:
Well, problem solved. Turns out things were NOT authenticating correctly
on normal logins, hence ipop3d couldn't either. It fooled me because
everything I was doing used ssh keys to get in.
I must have glossed over that part of your
Same reason some of my Servers that exposed to the internet run COL E2.3
- with all the latest patches/security updates - of course.
BFWIW - I am deploying SuSe 8.3 on desktop/Workstations these days.
It seems to be really stable and flat out WORKS with everthing I have thrown
at it, at the
I may be missing something obvious, but:
The enscript (1.6.3) man page claims that the footer option works just
like the header option, but, when I try it I get no footers in the output.
Looking at the postscript output shows that although my footer string
is indeed in the postscript file, there
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 10:30, Ben Duncan wrote:
Same reason some of my Servers that exposed to the internet run COL E2.3
- with all the latest patches/security updates - of course.
BFWIW - I am deploying SuSe 8.3 on desktop/Workstations these days.
It seems to be really stable and flat out
Well, it looks like if you want footers you sorta have to roll your
own. My solution is attached below.
I guess there is no do_footer routine because the do_header routine
does the footers, too, at least in some circumstances. There happens
to be a supplied fancy header a2ps.hdr which also prints
I want to know about various configuration files in Linux. I tried Linux network
administration guide of Orally but that book was made in 2000 and also does not
over many of the configuration files of system utilities. Can you please help me
to go to correct web page .
Thanx in advance.
Zohar
I want to know about various configuration files in Linux, its various variables
and values it mean and what all values it supports. I tried Linux network
administration guide of Orally but that book was made in 2000 and also does not
cover many of the configuration files of system utilities. Can
I want to know about various configuration files in Linux, its various variables
and values it mean and what all values it supports. I tried Linux network
administration guide of Orally but that book was made in 2000 and also does not
cover many of the configuration files of system utilities. Can
I've had issues using ifconfig to set MTU. Also, if the problem is MTU, you'll want
to set your Windows system MTU down as well... I believe Windows is not very good at
responding correctly to the ICMP messages which control transmission size. It just
makes everything cleaner.
Try the Linux
I want to use fmt in vi to format text, eg:
:1,$ ! fmt -w 130
Without vi, this command would look like:
cat file ! fmt -w 130
I want it to format everything except lines which begin with at least
two blanks, like this:
1. My list
First
Second
Third
Is
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003, Joel Hammer wrote:
I want to use fmt in vi to format text, eg:
:1,$ ! fmt -w 130
Without vi, this command would look like:
cat file ! fmt -w 130
I want it to format everything except lines which begin with at least
two blanks, like this:
Extend your
31 matches
Mail list logo
