Peter Ruskin babbled on about:
> I have to say I haven't studied any manuals about this (because "it works
> for me®") - it came from a tip by a guru on kde-linux list.
I don't use that. I just run startx with the --dpi 100 option
you should be able to edit /etc/X11/kdm/ as well
--
Douglas J Hun
On Thursday 07 Feb 2002 03:11, Michael Hipp wrote:
> Not sure I followed this. 1280 pixels across 301 mm = ~108 dpi. But
> does this cause X to change something about how it displays things?
>
> I was under the assumption that it was a 75dpi vs 100dpi thing related
> entirely to which font set to
begin Michael Hipp's quote:
| I was under the assumption that it was a 75dpi vs 100dpi thing
| related entirely to which font set to choose (or how to display the
| font perhaps).
no, that's determined (well, *was* -- with anti-aliasing and so on
now, typeface handling is known only to three
Not sure I followed this. 1280 pixels across 301 mm = ~108 dpi. But does
this cause X to change something about how it displays things?
I was under the assumption that it was a 75dpi vs 100dpi thing related
entirely to which font set to choose (or how to display the font perhaps).
Michael
On
--- Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 Feb 2002 22:06, Michael Hipp wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 February 2002 01:33 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> > > xdpyinfo|grep resol
> >
> > resolution:90x96 dots per inch
> >
> > > then tell me how you run X? through xdm? or startx?
On Wednesday 06 Feb 2002 22:06, Michael Hipp wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 February 2002 01:33 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> > xdpyinfo|grep resol
>
> resolution:90x96 dots per inch
>
> > then tell me how you run X? through xdm? or startx? or other?
>
> At this moment I boot straight into KDE whe
On Wednesday 06 February 2002 01:33 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> xdpyinfo|grep resol
resolution:90x96 dots per inch
> then tell me how you run X? through xdm? or startx? or other?
At this moment I boot straight into KDE when it enters runlevel 5. So I
presume I'm using kdm. I have attem
Typing furiously on February 06, Douglas J Hunley managed to emit:
> Michael Hipp babbled on about:
> > What's the *proper* way to do this (verify the libs)?
>
> rpm -q -a|more
>
> >
> > P.S. I recommend you run XFree86 in 100 DPI mode for best results.
> >
> > How is this done?
>
> xdpyinf
Michael Hipp babbled on about:
> What's the *proper* way to do this (verify the libs)?
rpm -q -a|more
>
> P.S. I recommend you run XFree86 in 100 DPI mode for best results.
>
> How is this done?
xdpyinfo|grep resol
then tell me how you run X? through xdm? or startx? or other?
--
Dougla
On Wednesday 06 February 2002 11:30 am, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> I'm glad that it worked for you! Did you catch the latest additions I put
> up about Mesa and Freetype?
I'm working on that now.
BTW, on that SxS, a couple of items stopped me cold at first:
3. Verify the following libs
Michael Hipp babbled on about:
> I finally got around to doing *all* the stuff in SxS -> XFREE -> XFree410.
> What a difference!
>
> My Linux box no longer has to bow its head in shame next to the W2k machine
> for readabilty. And my 41-year-old eyeballs will forever be indebted.
Please, call me
On Tue, 05 Feb 2002 18:40:59 -0600
Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I finally got around to doing *all* the stuff in SxS -> XFREE -> XFree410.
| What a difference!
I will have to check this as well. Col 3.1.1 has AA enablable. However, it
seems to only be set up for KDE's term. (And wi
I finally got around to doing *all* the stuff in SxS -> XFREE -> XFree410.
What a difference!
My Linux box no longer has to bow its head in shame next to the W2k machine
for readabilty. And my 41-year-old eyeballs will forever be indebted.
Thank you.
Michael
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
