Re: [Linux-users] CLUG Bank Account

2016-05-26 Thread David Kirk
Hi, Well I think the majority of people have chosen option 2, so I will close the account and find some way of getting the money to Rik. Rik, can you contact me offlist and send me some bank account details that I can transfer the money to? I also think we should reimburse Ross for any costs

Re: [Linux-users] CLUG Bank Account

2016-05-26 Thread Patelkhana Mohan Rao
Good Plan  Regards, Mohan Patelkhana From: Chris Hellyar To: Canterbury Linux Users Group Sent: Friday, 27 May 2016 10:04 AM Subject: Re: [Linux-users] CLUG Bank Account Good-o, sounds like a plan. :-) On 27/05/16

Re: [Linux-users] CLUG Bank Account

2016-05-26 Thread Jim Cheetham
There was another thread on that, but it seems to have been lost. I'm questioning the need to maintain the domain name registration at all; there doesn't seem to be any activity that needs it any more, and none planned. So why pay? (Yes, I'm being a little contrarian) -jim On Fri, May 27, 2016

Re: [Linux-users] CLUG Bank Account

2016-05-26 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
On Fri 27 May 2016 08:49:41 NZST +1200, David Kirk wrote: > I also think we should reimburse Ross for any costs relating to the domain > name. Send me details offlist and I'll organise payment. I think that should go without discussion! Is the current registrar of clug.org.nz sponsoring the

Re: [Linux-users] CLUG Bank Account

2016-05-26 Thread Derek Smithies
Jim, no worries. You are asking a reasonable question. Cheers, Derek. On 27/05/16 11:34, Jim Cheetham wrote: There was another thread on that, but it seems to have been lost. I'm questioning the need to maintain the domain name registration at all; there doesn't seem to be any activity that

Re: [Linux-users] CLUG Bank Account

2016-05-26 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
On Fri 27 May 2016 12:05:06 NZST +1200, David Kirk wrote: > Having looked at the http://www.clug.org.nz site, I don't think there is a > need to keep it. If Chris wants to take over the domain and keep CLUG > content on it, then I'm ok with that. I wouldn't like to see non-CLUG > stuff go on it