Re: [Linux-users] PATA drives - 80/40G

2015-08-17 Thread Chris Hellyar

Does it have to be PC/i386 stuff?

I'll be helping a firm pull out some old DEC hardware next month..   
Serious big-iron they are going to have to pay to get taken away if 
you're really keen.


It's not been powered on since about 1990, and you'll need a truck. :-)

On 17/08/15 18:57, Peter Simmonds wrote:

Hi Chris  Others,

I know what it's like. Would you mind keeping an eye out for exotic 
hardware, before it goes to molten media? They tend not to know much 
about what they are scrapping.


___
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: [Linux-users] PATA drives - 80/40G

2015-08-17 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
On Mon 17 Aug 2015 20:07:20 NZST +1200, criggie wrote:

 With all respect to Molten Media, if anyone's giving away drives do
 make sure they're wiped first, with something like dban rather than
 a casual wipe in $OS.

dban? dd is as good as it gets.

 Paranoia is a good thing.

Ha. Just came from a Christchurch Robotics meeting. They all laugh about
privacy, and the power companies collecting power use data from everyone
with at least 30min resolution. What problem.

Volker

-- 
Volker Kuhlmann
http://volker.top.geek.nz/  Please do not CC list postings to me.
___
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: [Linux-users] PATA drives - 80/40G

2015-08-17 Thread Chris Hellyar

scrub does it for me, not heard of dban before, will 'ave to have a look...

Anyway, spare drives I have, first in first served:

PATA:
1x WD400, 40G
2x Maxtor 20.4Gb   (20G?  is that even a thing? :) )
1x Hitachi Deskstar 82.3Gb

SATA:  (Turns out two were not as old as the others!)
1x Hitachi 80G
1x WD400 40G

They will be scrubbed before I bring them into town, which might take a 
day or three as I'll leave them running on a USB adaptor...


Cheers, Chris H.



On 17/08/15 20:07, criggie wrote:

On 17/08/15 12:00, linux-users-requ...@lists.canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
I go through a cylic thing where I collect parts from 
upgrades/repairs for customers and think 'that'll come in handy' and 
then after a few months realise I've collected a pile of junk that I 
drop off at Molten Media..  I thought I'd offer the drives up for 
free here first as I know there are some tinkerers on the list...
With all respect to Molten Media, if anyone's giving away drives do 
make sure they're wiped first, with something like dban rather than a 
casual wipe in $OS.


Paranoia is a good thing.




___
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: [Linux-users] email server; of sorts

2015-08-17 Thread Adrian Mageanu
On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 15:27 +1200, Jim Cheetham wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Adrian Mageanu 
 adrian.mage...@totalimex.com wrote:
 
  Errr, scratch that, I found they invented google.
 
 
 Sure, but if you don't know the right  words to use to describe your
 problem, you won't be able to find the best technical detail :-)
 
 -jim

So true, I spent a silly amount of time looking for something like kerio
in the FOSS world - that server does all I want and some, but it's not
FOSS and the price is prohibitive for personal use.

At some stage I started playing with Zimbra, but there I had the same
problem I'm trying to avoid with this setup, meaning that for an IMAP
account I couldn't find a way to keep a local copy of a message after it
was deleted from the server.

Glad you ignored this message.

I started working on this, I'll post the configuration when I finish. Or
ask for some more directions if I get stuck.


Adrian


___
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: [Linux-users] Data security and privacy (Re: PATA drives - 80/40G)

2015-08-17 Thread Jim Cheetham
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Helmut Walle helmut.wa...@gmail.com
wrote:

 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdx
 ...
 If you want better security use /dev/urandom instead of /dev/zero, however
 take into account that this can be slower as it does require some CPU work,
 whereas /dev/zero produces the zero bytes with very little CPU involvement
 and thus is noticeably faster, particularly on old hardware.


Security  convenience (speed) rarely go together :-)

Blasting zeros onto the disk is nice, because you can easily tell later on
if it worked. If you put random data on there you might not be able to
confirm it was a successful write!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_remanence discusses the problem quite
well, and while there are various organisations that publish standards
requiring multiple passes with differing data patterns, there don't seem to
be any successful reconstructions from the simpler delete.
https://kromey.us/2013/04/the-myth-of-data-remanence-484.html

The more complex overwrite/delete cycles are a handy workout for the drive,
however; if you have time, running multiple passes of dban on the disk both
destroys any data on there, and confirms that there are no terminal bad
blocks :-) which is a nice extra.

-jim
___
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: [Linux-users] Data security and privacy (Re: PATA drives - 80/40G)

2015-08-17 Thread Kent Fredric
On 18 August 2015 at 14:21, Adrian Mageanu adrian.mage...@totalimex.com wrote:
 I can't remember where I read but there are ways to retrieve data after
 a dd fill with zeroes or something else by using photorec and some
 hardware forensic techniques.

 The only downside with dban and nwipe is that for relatively recent
 large HDDs it takes ages to finish.

 A while back I gave away 2x400GB SATA2 disks and one disk took 37 hours
 to wipe with dban.


If you're paranoid, I'd be spending more time getting past the
hard-drive firmware and getting into the protected regions, and the
bad blocks that the drive silently reallocated away from you, and
making sure they're zeroed out as well.

Those blocks, if any of them exist, will not only contain entire
sectors of your data, but they will contain enough of your data that
the error correcting codes are still sufficient for the hard drive
firmware to have transparently hidden the fact it saw a bad bit or
two, and silently copied that data to a new place and pretended it
never happened.

http://superuser.com/a/688764

And there's always firmware caches as well that might have bits of
data in them to be concerned about.

-- 
Kent

KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL
___
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: [Linux-users] Data security and privacy (Re: PATA drives - 80/40G)

2015-08-17 Thread Adrian Mageanu
On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 11:50 +1000, Fraser McGlinn wrote:
 On 17/08/15 21:30, Helmut Walle wrote:
 
  And yes, for wiping disks something like
 
  dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdx
 
  does the job (obviously replacing 'x' with the letter for the drive to
  be wiped). Without any further arguments, this will eventually fill
  the disk and terminate when running out of space. You can give is a
  block size bs=... and count=... to exactly fill the disk.
 I definately agree with Criggie on this - You need to be a bit more
 diligent in wiping your data. I prefer DBAN as well. If its an old drive
 such as a PATA drive which will have no foreseeable use, i'd probably
 demantile it and use the platters as coasters too. Also to grab the
 magnets as a fiddle toy.
 
 We should be taking data security seriously since even stuff such as SSH
 private keys, SSL private keys, DNS DNSSEC keys etc, are definitely
 sensitive and can be used for years without rolling them to new ones.
 
 But at the end of the day, each to their own. I can't force others to
 take data security seriously.
 ___

+1 for dban. nwipe can also do the job and is included in most distros,
no need for a separate boot

I can't remember where I read but there are ways to retrieve data after
a dd fill with zeroes or something else by using photorec and some
hardware forensic techniques.

The only downside with dban and nwipe is that for relatively recent
large HDDs it takes ages to finish.

A while back I gave away 2x400GB SATA2 disks and one disk took 37 hours
to wipe with dban.

Adrian




___
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: [Linux-users] PATA drives - 80/40G

2015-08-17 Thread Bevan
I have an old compac rack server sitting in the garage dual power supply
one cpu though don't know the specs but it is old



On 17 August 2015 at 18:57, Peter Simmonds peter.a.simmo...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Hi Chris  Others,

 I know what it's like. Would you mind keeping an eye out for exotic
 hardware, before it goes to molten media? They tend not to know much about
 what they are scrapping.

 As an example, I recently pulled an ordinary looking ISA card from an
 absolutely shagged old 386. This card was the basis for downloading data
 from a portable ECG monitor (as used in ambulances) into a computer.
 Without it the heartbeat waveform was only 8 pixels high on the LCD screen
 the units have. Would have otherwise taken months to reverse-engineer the
 communication these devices were using. Now I can just buy a PC104
 motherboard from ebay, install the operating system and hard-wire the card
 straight on to it!

 Do let me (us?) know if anything exotic turns up, as the hardware is
 needed to create drivers, which in turn could possibly end up in the linux
 kernal!

 Cheers,

 Peter

 On 17/08/2015 11:55, Chris Hellyar wrote:

 Hi Peter,



 They are fine for legacy machines, but I've got a lot of spare junk and I
 want the space back. :-)



 I go through a cylic thing where I collect parts from upgrades/repairs for
 customers and think 'that'll come in handy' and then after a few months
 realise I've collected a pile of junk that I drop off at Molten Media..  I
 thought I'd offer the drives up for free here first as I know there are
 some tinkerers on the list...



 I'll go through em tonight and reply with a list of the sizes..  There
 were some 40's and at least one 80 in there, and I think a 100 but I wasn't
 paying that much attention to be honest...  If it wasn't 400G+ it went on
 the 'out' pile...



 Cheers, Chris H.





 -Original Message-
 From: Peter Simmonds peter.a.simmo...@gmail.com
 peter.a.simmo...@gmail.com

 Hi Chris  Others,

 I think these may be useful when formatted with FAT32 and maybe on a
 USB2 to PATA adapter. I have tried on many occasions to get various
 livecd distributions to work on various hard drives. They always seem to
 require FAT32, and frequently fail due to some other factor (I'm
 guessing the USB-PATA bridge). Perhaps the lower CHS count on these
 drives may improve compatibility? Have seen W98SE2 running on an 80Gb
 drive myself. I also suspect there is some extension to FAT32 used by
 default at least in windoze that would seem to create incompatibilities
 with creating bootable live CD distros.

 Hopefully someone else on the mailing list will be able to give better
 advice...

 In any case, I could do with a few of these myself, to upgrade some
 legacy systems.

 Cheers,

 Peter





 ___
 Linux-users mailing 
 listlinux-us...@lists.canterbury.ac.nzhttp://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



 ___
 Linux-users mailing list
 Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
 http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users




-- 
Regards

Bevan

Linux Aficionado and Arch Linux fanboy


In a world without fences and walls, who needs Gates and Windows?
___
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: [Linux-users] PATA drives - 80/40G

2015-08-17 Thread Peter Simmonds

Hi Chris  Others,

I know what it's like. Would you mind keeping an eye out for exotic 
hardware, before it goes to molten media? They tend not to know much 
about what they are scrapping.


As an example, I recently pulled an ordinary looking ISA card from an 
absolutely shagged old 386. This card was the basis for downloading data 
from a portable ECG monitor (as used in ambulances) into a computer. 
Without it the heartbeat waveform was only 8 pixels high on the LCD 
screen the units have. Would have otherwise taken months to 
reverse-engineer the communication these devices were using. Now I can 
just buy a PC104 motherboard from ebay, install the operating system and 
hard-wire the card straight on to it!


Do let me (us?) know if anything exotic turns up, as the hardware is 
needed to create drivers, which in turn could possibly end up in the 
linux kernal!


Cheers,

Peter

On 17/08/2015 11:55, Chris Hellyar wrote:


Hi Peter,

They are fine for legacy machines, but I've got a lot of spare junk 
and I want the space back. :-)


I go through a cylic thing where I collect parts from upgrades/repairs 
for customers and think 'that'll come in handy' and then after a few 
months realise I've collected a pile of junk that I drop off at Molten 
Media..  I thought I'd offer the drives up for free here first as I 
know there are some tinkerers on the list...


I'll go through em tonight and reply with a list of the sizes..  There 
were some 40's and at least one 80 in there, and I think a 100 but I 
wasn't paying that much attention to be honest...  If it wasn't 400G+ 
it went on the 'out' pile...


Cheers, Chris H.

-Original Message-
From: Peter Simmonds peter.a.simmo...@gmail.com

Hi Chris  Others,

I think these may be useful when formatted with FAT32 and maybe on a
USB2 to PATA adapter. I have tried on many occasions to get various
livecd distributions to work on various hard drives. They always seem to
require FAT32, and frequently fail due to some other factor (I'm
guessing the USB-PATA bridge). Perhaps the lower CHS count on these
drives may improve compatibility? Have seen W98SE2 running on an 80Gb
drive myself. I also suspect there is some extension to FAT32 used by
default at least in windoze that would seem to create incompatibilities
with creating bootable live CD distros.

Hopefully someone else on the mailing list will be able to give better
advice...

In any case, I could do with a few of these myself, to upgrade some
legacy systems.

Cheers,

Peter





___
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


___
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: [Linux-users] PATA drives - 80/40G

2015-08-17 Thread criggie

On 17/08/15 20:11, linux-users-requ...@lists.canterbury.ac.nz wrote:

I have an old compac rack server sitting in the garage dual power supply
one cpu though don't know the specs but it is old
Given Compaq stopped making servers at least 15 years ago, that box will 
be a p3 xeon with maybe a couple hundred MB of ram, if it


Practically, no use.

Not really old or rare enough to be in a museum, although Pleasent Point 
Railway Museum might be interested, whereas Ferrymead is quite 
space-constrained.


And it'll likely use a heap more power than any modern box, if you 
wanted to run it as a quirky device.


So its really only useful as art, or perhaps a bookend, or a leg for a 
workbench.


Sorry.

--
Criggie

http://criggie.org.nz/

___
Linux-users mailing list
Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users